Proposed Internal Security Act of 1968: Hearings, Ninetieth Congress, Second Session, on S. 2988, Part 1 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 56
Page 209
... Speiser , of the American Civil Liberties Union , that normally at com- mittee hearings you are seeking opinion and not fact , and , therefore , unlike court procedure swearing to one's testimony is not in good order . I wonder if you ...
... Speiser , of the American Civil Liberties Union , that normally at com- mittee hearings you are seeking opinion and not fact , and , therefore , unlike court procedure swearing to one's testimony is not in good order . I wonder if you ...
Page 259
... Speiser , director of the Washington office of the American Civil Liberties Union , began his testimony on S. 2988. Because of the length of his testimony , he was unable to complete his presentation . So that all his PROPOSED INTERNAL ...
... Speiser , director of the Washington office of the American Civil Liberties Union , began his testimony on S. 2988. Because of the length of his testimony , he was unable to complete his presentation . So that all his PROPOSED INTERNAL ...
Page 270
... Speiser , Lawrence Stanford University- . 209 , 259-260 268 244 , 245 , 248 262 269 228 227 229 Subversive Activities Control Act of 1950__ 225 218 , 220 , 222 , 223 , 224 , 238 , 239 , 240 223 261 228 Statement of Purposes , American ...
... Speiser , Lawrence Stanford University- . 209 , 259-260 268 244 , 245 , 248 262 269 228 227 229 Subversive Activities Control Act of 1950__ 225 218 , 220 , 222 , 223 , 224 , 238 , 239 , 240 223 261 228 Statement of Purposes , American ...
Page 440
... Speiser , the director of the Washington Civil Liberties Union , began his testi- mony on this bill several weeks ago . He got part of the way through his statement and was asked to defer the remainder of his testimony to allow a ...
... Speiser , the director of the Washington Civil Liberties Union , began his testi- mony on this bill several weeks ago . He got part of the way through his statement and was asked to defer the remainder of his testimony to allow a ...
Page 484
... Speiser v . Randall , 357 U.S. 513 ( 1958 ) ; Sherbert v . Verner , 374 U.S. 398 ( 1963 ) ; and Reed v . Gardner , 261 F. Supp . 87 ( C.D. Calif . , 1966 ) . They also raise due process problems in the characterization by the Secretary ...
... Speiser v . Randall , 357 U.S. 513 ( 1958 ) ; Sherbert v . Verner , 374 U.S. 398 ( 1963 ) ; and Reed v . Gardner , 261 F. Supp . 87 ( C.D. Calif . , 1966 ) . They also raise due process problems in the characterization by the Secretary ...
Common terms and phrases
action Activities Control Board agency American applicant Attorney authority believe BERZAK bill BIRCH BAYH BISHOP Captain READ Chairman citizens Civil Service Commission classified information committee Communist Party Congress congressional constitutional counsel criminal decision defense facility Department of Defense determination EASTLAND effect Elfbrandt employee employment enactment evaluation executive agencies Executive Order Federal files foreign Government hearing HONNOLD individual Internal Security Act international organizations JAFFE JOHNSON Judiciary legislation LIEBLING MAHAN McNICHOL ment national security North Vietnam officer opinion overthrow passport person personnel security position present procedures provisions purpose question reason record referred respect responsibility Secretary of Defense security clearance security program Senator BAYH Senator DODD Senator HRUSKA Senator THURMOND Smith Act social security SOURWINE SPEISER statement statute subcommittee Subversive Activities Control Supreme Court testimony thereof tion U.S. Senate United States Code vessel Vietnam visas witness YEAGLEY
Popular passages
Page 514 - The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.
Page 496 - And a statute which either forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application violates the first essential of due process of law.
Page 372 - They shall refrain from any action which might reflect on their position as international officials responsible only to the Organization.
Page 382 - ... of a foreign nation whose interests may be inimical to the interests of the United States, or with any person who advocates the use of force or violence to overthrow the Government of the United States or the alteration of the form of Government of the United States by unconstitutional means.
Page 224 - Act be construed as invalidating any provision of State law unless such provision is inconsistent with any of the purposes of this Act, or any provision thereof.
Page 394 - If he is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of an averment, he shall so state and this has the effect of a denial.
Page 392 - Performing or attempting to perform his duties, or otherwise acting, so as to serve the interests of another government in preference to the interests of the United States.
Page 259 - States with reference to the political or public interests, policies, or relations of a government of a foreign country or a foreign political party or with reference to the foreign policies of the United States...
Page 372 - The standard for the refusal of employment or the removal from employment in an executive department or agency on grounds relating to loyalty shall be that, on all the evidence, there is a reasonable doubt as to the loyalty of the person involved to the Government of the United States.
Page 460 - In each case [courts] must ask whether the gravity of the 'evil,' discounted by its improbability, justifies such invasion of free speech as is necessary to avoid the danger.