Proposed Internal Security Act of 1968: Hearings, Ninetieth Congress, Second Session, on S. 2988, Part 1 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 79
... Department of Justice 13 charged by law or under the instructions of the Attorney 14 General with authority to act , any person shall have violated 15 this chapter , the Department shall proceed as speedily as 16 possible with a ...
... Department of Justice 13 charged by law or under the instructions of the Attorney 14 General with authority to act , any person shall have violated 15 this chapter , the Department shall proceed as speedily as 16 possible with a ...
Page 84
... department of the United States 19 Government headed by a Cabinet officer . The term " Cabinet 20 intelligence item ... department . 243 24 25 ( b ) Each Cabinet department , and any department or agency of the United States which ...
... department of the United States 19 Government headed by a Cabinet officer . The term " Cabinet 20 intelligence item ... department . 243 24 25 ( b ) Each Cabinet department , and any department or agency of the United States which ...
Page 85
... department shall by regulation or order provide 2 for designation and handling , in compliance with this sec- 3 tion ... department to which it is of special significance . 9 ( d ) Whenever a Cabinet intelligence item shall be 10 ...
... department shall by regulation or order provide 2 for designation and handling , in compliance with this sec- 3 tion ... department to which it is of special significance . 9 ( d ) Whenever a Cabinet intelligence item shall be 10 ...
Page 120
... Department, since the hearings have been scheduled to begin February 27, 1968. With best personal regards, I am, Sincerely, James O. Eastland, Chairman, Internal Security Subcommittee. Department ok State, Washington, March 1, 1068. Hon ...
... Department, since the hearings have been scheduled to begin February 27, 1968. With best personal regards, I am, Sincerely, James O. Eastland, Chairman, Internal Security Subcommittee. Department ok State, Washington, March 1, 1068. Hon ...
Page 119
... Department of State , which I offer for the record . Senator HRUSKA . It will be received without objection . ( The letter referred to follows :) Hon . JAMES O. EASTLAND , Chairman , Committee on the Judiciary , U.S. Senate , Washington ...
... Department of State , which I offer for the record . Senator HRUSKA . It will be received without objection . ( The letter referred to follows :) Hon . JAMES O. EASTLAND , Chairman , Committee on the Judiciary , U.S. Senate , Washington ...
Common terms and phrases
action Activities Control Board agency American applicant Attorney authority believe BERZAK bill BIRCH BAYH BISHOP Captain READ Chairman citizens Civil Service Commission classified information committee Communist Party Congress congressional constitutional counsel criminal decision defense facility Department of Defense determination EASTLAND effect Elfbrandt employee employment enactment evaluation executive agencies Executive Order Federal files foreign Government hearing HONNOLD individual Internal Security Act international organizations JAFFE JOHNSON Judiciary legislation LIEBLING MAHAN McNICHOL ment national security North Vietnam officer opinion overthrow passport person personnel security position present procedures provisions purpose question reason record referred respect responsibility Secretary of Defense security clearance security program Senator BAYH Senator DODD Senator HRUSKA Senator THURMOND Smith Act social security SOURWINE SPEISER statement statute subcommittee Subversive Activities Control Supreme Court testimony thereof tion U.S. Senate United States Code vessel Vietnam visas witness YEAGLEY
Popular passages
Page 514 - The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.
Page 496 - And a statute which either forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application violates the first essential of due process of law.
Page 372 - They shall refrain from any action which might reflect on their position as international officials responsible only to the Organization.
Page 382 - ... of a foreign nation whose interests may be inimical to the interests of the United States, or with any person who advocates the use of force or violence to overthrow the Government of the United States or the alteration of the form of Government of the United States by unconstitutional means.
Page 224 - Act be construed as invalidating any provision of State law unless such provision is inconsistent with any of the purposes of this Act, or any provision thereof.
Page 394 - If he is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of an averment, he shall so state and this has the effect of a denial.
Page 392 - Performing or attempting to perform his duties, or otherwise acting, so as to serve the interests of another government in preference to the interests of the United States.
Page 259 - States with reference to the political or public interests, policies, or relations of a government of a foreign country or a foreign political party or with reference to the foreign policies of the United States...
Page 372 - The standard for the refusal of employment or the removal from employment in an executive department or agency on grounds relating to loyalty shall be that, on all the evidence, there is a reasonable doubt as to the loyalty of the person involved to the Government of the United States.
Page 460 - In each case [courts] must ask whether the gravity of the 'evil,' discounted by its improbability, justifies such invasion of free speech as is necessary to avoid the danger.