« PreviousContinue »
bers of the Christian church shall visibly have this circumci. sion. The apostle speaks in like manner, of the members of the church of Philippi as spiritually circumcised (i. e. in profession and visibility) and tells wherein this circumcision appeared. Philip. iii. 3. “ For we are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh.” And in Rom. ii. 28, 29, the apostle speaks of this Christian circumcision and Jewish circumcision together, calling the former tbe circumcision of the heart." But he is not a Jew which is one outwardly, neither is that circumcision which is outward in the FLESH ; but he is a Jew, which is one in wardly, and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, not in the letter ; whose praise is not of men, but of God.” And whereas in this prophecy of Ezekiel it is foretold, that none should enter into the Christian sanctuary or church, but such as are circumcised in heart and circumcised in flesh ; thereby I suppose is intended, that none should be admitted but such as were visibly regenerated, and also baptised with outward bapusm.
By the things which have been observed, I think it abundantly evident, that the saintship, godliness, and holiness, of which, according to scripture, professing Christians and visible saints do make a profession and have a visibility, is not any religion and virtue that is the result of common grace, or moral sincerity (as it is called) but saving grace. Yet there are many other clear evidences of the same thing, which may in some measure appear in all the following part of this discourse. Wherefore,
II. I come now to another reason, why I answer the question at first proposed, in the negative, viz. That it is a duty which in an ordinary state of things is required of all that are capable of it, to make an explicit open profession of the true religion, by owning God's covenant; or, in other words, professedly and verbally to unite themselves to God in his covenant, by their own public act.
Here I would (first) prove this point ; and then (secondly) draw the consequence, and shew how this demonstrates the thing in debate.
First....I shall endeavor to establish this point, viz. That it is the duty of God's people thus publicly to own the covenant ; and that it was not only a duty in Israel of old, but is so in the Christian church, and to the end of the world ; and that it is a duty required of adult persons before they come to sacraments. And this being a point of great consequence in this controversy, but a matter seldom handled (tliough it seems to be generally taken for granted) I shall be the more particular in the consideration of it.
This not only seems to be in itself most consonant to reason, and is a duty generally allowed in New England, but is evidently a great institution of the word of God, appointed as a very important part of that public religion by which God's people should give honor to his name. This institution we have in Deut. vi. 13. “ Thou shalt fear the Lord thy God, and serve him, and shalt swear by his name." It is repeated, chap. x. 20. “ Thou shalt fear the Lord thy God, him shalt thou serve, and to him shalt thou cleave, and swear by his name." In both places it might have been rendered; thou shalt swear in his name, or into his name. In the original, bishmo, the prefix is beth, which signifies in or into, as well as by. And whereas, in the latter place, in our translation, it is said, to him shalt thou cleave, and swear by his name, the words are thus in the Hebrew, ubho thidhbak ubhishmo tissiabheang. The literal translation of which is, into him shalt thou cleave (or unite] and into his name shalt thou swear. There is the same prefix, beth, before him, when it is said, thou shalt cleave to him, as before his name, when it is said, thou shalt swear by his name. Swearing into God's Dame, is a very emphatical and significant way of expressing a person's taking on himself, by his own solemn profession, the name of God, as one of his people ; or by swearing to or covenanting with God, uniting himself by his own act to the people that is called by his name. The figure of speech is something like that by which Christians in the New Testament are said to be baptized us to ovoua, into the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost. So Christians are said to be baptized into Christ, Gal. iii. 17. This swearing by the name, or into the name of the Lord, is so often, and in such as manner spoken of by the prophets as a great duty of God's solemn public worship, as much as praying or sacrificing, that it would be unreasonable to understand it only, or chiefly, of occasionally taking an oath before a court of judicature, which, it may be, one tenth part of the people never had occasion to do once in their lives. If we well consider the matter, we shall see abundant reason to be satisfied, that the thing intended in this institution was publicly covenanting with God. Covenanting in scripture is very often called by the name of swearing, and a covenant is called an oath.* And particularly God's covenant is called his oath, Deut. xxix. 12. " That thou shouldst enter into covenant with the Lord thy God, and into his oath.” Ver. 14. 6 Neither with you only do I make this covenant and this oath." 1 Chron. xvi. 15, 16. “ Be ye mindful always of his covenant : Even of the covenant which he made with Abraham, and his oath unto Isaac.” 2 Chron, xv. 12. “And they entered into covenant to seek the Lord God of their fathers.” Ver. 14, 15. And they sware unto the Lord with a loud voice : And all Judah rejoiced at the oath.” Swearing to the Lord, or swearing in, or into the name of the Lord, are equipollent expressions in the Bible. The prefixes beth and lamed are evidently used indifferently in this case to signify the same thing. Zeph. i. 5. “ That swear by the Lord, and that swear by Malcham.” The word translated to the Lord, is Laihovah, with the prefix lamed; but to Malcham is Bemalcham with the prefix beth into Malcham. In 1 Kings xviii. 32, it is said, “ Elijah built an altar in the name of the Lord ;" beshem. Here the prefix beth is manifestly of the same force with lamed, in 1 Kings viii. 44. “ The house I have built for thy name or to thy name ;" leshem,
God's people in swearing to his name, or into his name, according to the institution, solemnly professed two things, viz. their faith and obedience. The former part of this profession of religion was called, Saying, the Lord liveth. Jer. v. . « And though they say, the Lord liveth, yet surely they swear falsely.” Ver. 7. “ They have sworn by them that are no gods :" That is, they had openly professed idol worship. Chap. iv. 2..66 Thou shalt swear, the Lord liveth, in truth, in judgment, and in righteousness; and the nations shall bless themselves in him, and in him shall they glory.” (Compare this with Isa. xlv. 23, 24, 25.) Jer. xliv. 26. " Behold I have sworn by my great name, saith the Lord, that my name shall no more be named in the mouth of any man of Judah in all the land of Egypt, saying, the Lord liveth :" i. e. They shall never any more make any profession of the true God, and of the true religion, but shall be wholly given up to Heathenism. See also Jer. xii. 16, and xvi. 14, 15, and xxiii. 7,8. Hos. iv. 15. Amos viii, 14, and ver. 5.
* As Gen. xxi. 23, to the end, xxvi. 28, to the end, xxxi. 44. 53. Josh. ii, 12, &c. 1 Sam. xx. 16, 17. 42.
2 Kings xi. 4. Eccl. viii. 2. Ezek. xvi. 59, xvii, 16, and many other places.
These words CHAI JEHOVAH, Jehovah liveth, summarily comprehended a profession of faith in that allsufficiency and immutability of God, which is implied in the name JEHOVAH, and which attributes are very often signified in scripture by God's being the LIVING GOD, as is very manifest from Josh. iii. 10. 1 Sam. xvii. 26, 36. 2 Kings xix. 4, 16. Dan. vi. 26. Psal. xviii. 46, and innumerable other places.
The other thing professed in swearing into the Lord was obedience, called, Walking in the name of the Lord. Micah iv. 5. “ All people will walk every one in the name of his God, and we will walk in the name of the Lord our God for ever and ever." Still with the prefix beth, beshem, as they were said to swear beshem, in the name, or into the name of the Lord.
This institution, in Deuteronomy, of swearing into the name of the Lord, or visibly and explicitly uniting themselves to him in covenant, was not prescribed as an extraordinary duty, or a duty to be performed on a return from a general apostacy, and some other extraordinary occasions : But is evidently mentioned in the institution, as a part of the public worship of God to be performed by all God's people, properly belonging to the visible worshippers of Jehovah; and so it is very often mentioned by the prophets, as I observed before, VOL. I.
and could largely demonstrate, if there was occasion for it, and would not too much lengthen out this discourse.
And this was not only an institution belonging to Israel under the Old Testament, but also to Gentile converts, and Christians under the New Testament. Thus God declares concerning the Gentile nations, Jer. xii. 16, “ If they will diligently learn the ways of my people, to swear by my name, the Lord liveth, as they taught my people to swear by Baal : Then shall they be built in the midst of my people,” i. e. They shall be added to my church ; or as the Apostle Paul expresses it, Eph. iii. 19....22. “ They shall be no more strangers and foreigners, but fellow citizens with the saints, and of the household of God, and be built upon the foundation of Christ ; in whom all the building, fitly framed together, &c. In whom they also shall be builded for an habitation of God through the Spirit." So it is foretold, that the way of public covenanting should be the way of the Gentiles joining themselves to the church in the days of the gospel, Isa. xliv, 3, 4, 5. " I will pour water upon him that is thirsty, and floods upon the dry ground ; I will pour my Spirit upon thy $eed, and my blessiog upon thine offspring, and they shall spring up as among the grass, as willows by the water courses ; one shall say, I am the Lord's, and another shall call himself by the name of Jacob, and another shall subscribe with his hand unto the Lord.” As subscribing an in. strument whereby they bound themselves to the Lord. This was subscribing and covenanting themselves into the name of Israel, and swearing into the name of the Lord, in the language of those forementioned texts in Deuteronomy. So taking hold of God's covenant, is foretold as the way in which the sons of the stranger in the days of the gospel should be joined to God's church, and brought into God's sanctuary, and to have communion in its worship and ordinances, in Isa. Ivi. 3, 6, 7. So in Isa. xix. 18, the future conversion of the Gentiles in the days of the gospel, and their being brought to profess the true religion, is expressed by that, that they should swear to the Lord of Hosts. “ In that day shall five cities in the land of Egypt speak the language of Canaan, and swear to