Page images
PDF
EPUB

proposed contractor and the solicitation number.

(2) A statement indicating whether or not the deviation had been previously requested. If so, outline the circumstances involved and the disposition of that request.

[49 FR 36237, Sept. 14, 1984, as amended at 51 FR 20486, June 5, 1986]

PART PHS 302-DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS

AUTHORITY: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).

Subpart PHS 302.1-Definitions

PHS 302.170 Definitions of terms.

The following terms, when utilized in PHS supplementing or implementing issuances to the HHSAR, have the meanings set forth below.

PHS agencies identifies collectively that group of organizational entities within the PHS which have assigned major health functions as currently shown in the PHS Organization Handbook. The PHS agencies are as follows: Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration (ADAMHA)

Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Health Resources and Services Administra-
tion (HRSA)

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

PHS agency heads identifies collectively those individuals who are given the responsibility and authority to manage and direct the efforts of the PHS agencies. These are the Administrators of ADAMHA and HRSA, Commissioner of FDA, and Directors of NIH and CDC.

PHS contracting activities identifies collectively those organizational elements of the PHS staff offices and the PHS agencies which have functional responsibility to contract for the acquisition of personal property and nonpersonal services.

[49 FR 36238, Sept. 14, 1984]

[blocks in formation]

PHS 304.170

Ratification of unauthorized contract awards.

(c)(2) Where ratification of an unauthorized contract action within a PHS agency is requested, the contracting officer shall forward the file through acquisition channels to an official at an organizational level above the contracting officer. He/she in turn shall analyze and evaluate the contracting officer's submission and make appropriate recommendations regarding ratification to the head of the contracting activity.

The Administrative Services Center (ASC), Office of Management (OM), will submit its requests for ratification to the Director, OM through the Division of Grants and Contracts (DGC), Office of Resource Management, OM/PHS.

(c)(4)(i) PHS agencies, and ASC, OM/ PHS, shall submit a report of ratification data as specified in 304.170. PHS agencies with several contracting offices will be required to collect the required information from these activities and submit a consolidated agency report.

(ii) These reports shall be submitted to DGC/ORM/OM/PHS within 20 days following the expiration of the reporting period. A consolidated PHS report will be prepared for submission to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Procurement, Assistance, and Logistics as specified in 304.170.

Subpart PHS 304.6-Contract
Reporting

PHS 304.670 PHS Contract Information System (PHSCIS).

The PHS Contract Information System consolidates all PHS contract data for the Department-wide Contract Information System (DCIS) from the PHS contracting activities.

PHS 304.670-1 Policy

The PHS principal officials responsible for acquisition (PORA) are responsible for ensuring that all required information is collected, submitted, and received into the PHSCIS in accordance with the central PHSCIS User Manual.

[49 FR 36238, Sept. 14, 1984, as amended at 51 FR 20486, June 5, 1986]

PHS 304.670-2 PHS agency implementation.

It is the responsibility of the PORAS to develop and implement appropriate procedures within their activities to ensure that data submissions to the PHSCIS are timely, error free, and contain all the required information.

Subpart PHS 304.71-Review and Approval of Proposed Contract Awards

PHS 304.7101 Contracts requiring review and approval.

(b)(2)(i) In addition to the reviews required by 304.7101(a) and PHS 304.7101(c), internal reviews are to be conducted of acquisitions made by the following contracting offices in the National Institutes of Health for contract awards that fall below the dollar threshold for review and approval set forth in PHS 304.7101(c) but exceed the dollar threshold set forth herein: National Cancer Institute $750,000

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute$500,000

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences-$250,000

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases-$250,000

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development-$250,000

Centralized procuring activity for all other National Institutes of Health Research Organizations (Research Contracts Branch)— $250,000

These internal reviews shall be conducted by senior personnel with each contracting office. Typically, the chief of contracting office or his/her deputy should be involved in the review. Personnel involved in the contract action shall not perform the review. Each review shall be documented in writing, and any substantive issues identified shall be resolved prior to award.

(ii) Furthermore, to assure that an adequate review of smaller dollar acquisitions is made prior to award, a statistically significant sample of contract actions of dollar values, less than those amounts referenced in this section is required to be approved prior to award. This review and approval will be by the designated Reviewing Official listed in paragraph (c) (but see PHS 304.7102(a)). Records of such review actions will be maintained and will include documentation of the resolution of any significant issue raised by the review.

(iii) Contract awards and modifications of proposed architect-engineer contracts expected to exceed $50,000 shall be reviewed and approved prior to award by the reviewing official designated in PHS 304.7101(c).

(c) Reviewing officials. For PHS agency contract awards expected to exceed the dollar amounts stated in this paragraph, the reviewing official indicated will personally approve the award. Other than these specified requirements for the designated reviewing official, PHS agencies may assign other review and approval responsibilities at their discretion. The following officials shall be responsible for preaward contract review and approval of all proposed contracts and modifications which are expected to exceed the dollar limits expressed below:

[graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][graphic][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][graphic][subsumed][merged small][subsumed][graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][graphic][subsumed][subsumed]

[49 FR 36238, Sept. 14, 1984, as amended at 51 FR 20486, June 5, 1986]

PHS 304.7102 Conduct of the review.

(a) General. The reviewing official is not required to personally perform the review, but he or she is responsible for assuring that the reviewer is knowledgeable in the acquisition field and

has sufficient expertise to perform a comprehensive review and to make cogent recommendations to the reviewing official for actions exceeding the dollar amounts stated in this subpart. The reviewing official shall approve each proposed contract award that is reviewed.

SUBCHAPTER B-ACQUISITION PLANNING

PART PHS 305-PUBLICIZING

CONTRACT ACTIONS

AUTHORITY: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).

Subpart PHS 305.2-Synopses of Proposed Contract Actions

PHS 305.202 Exceptions.

(b) A determination and finding has been executed by the Acting Assistant Secretary for Health after concurrence by the Administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy and the Administrator of the Small Business Administration, which exempts for the period September 30, 1985 through September 29, 1988, certain acquisitions with the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) from the synopsis requirements set forth in FAR 5.201. This exemption is applicable only to acquisitions where NAS is the only source which can provide the measure of expertise, independence, objectivity, and audience acceptance necessary to meet the program requirements. To ensure that this exemption will be used only when appropriate, the agency competition advocate shall certify, prior to award, each acquisition with NAS which is not synopsized regardless of the dollar value. The certification must state that only NAS can provide the measure of expertise, independence, objectivity, and audience acceptance necessary to meet the program needs.

[51 FR 20487, June 5, 1986]

[blocks in formation]
« PreviousContinue »