B-175155 United States Railway Association, Final System Plan for Restructuring Railroads in the Northeast and Midwest Region Pursuant to the Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973, Vol. I, p. 42 (July 26, 1975). The plan for the ownership of resources was based in part on the principle that "[w]here freight and passenger operations both use a facility, the dominant user should own the facility and bear all the costs of that facility except those which could be avoided if the minority user were not present.' Id., at 41. The designations required by section 206 (c) (1) (C) of Pub. L. No. 93236 are contained in volume I of the Plan, Part II, Appendix Section C, pages 323-326. On February 5, 1976, Congress enacted the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976, Pub. L. No. 94-210, 90 Stat. 31. Section 701(b) of Pub. L. No. 94-210, 90 Stat. 120, provides as follows: "TRANSFER OF RAIL PROPERTIES.--The Corporation [ConRail], Section 704 (a) (3) (B), 90 Stat. 123, authorized the appropriation to the Secretary of Transportation, for payment to Amtrak, of "$85,182,956 to acquire the properties of the Northeast Corridor." Section 705 (b), designated as a "conforming amendment," amended section 601 (d) (1) of Pub. L. No. 93-236, supra, to read as follows: "Rail properties designated in accordance with sec- B-175155 Section 706(b) of S. 2718, the derivative source of section 705(b), had directed Amtrak to purchase the Northeast Corridor properties. The section was revised in conference, at the suggestion of DOT, to give Amtrak the authority to lease as well as purchase. H. R. Rep. No. 94-768, 180 (1975). Amtrak was established pursuant to the Rail Passenger Service Act of 1970, 45 U.S.c. $$ 501 et seq. It is a for-profit corporation whose purpose is to "provide intercity rail passenger service" and, like ConRail, is not an "agency or establishment of the United States Government." 45 U.S.C. § 541 (1970). In 31 U.S.C. § 856(6) (Supp. IV, 1974) it is (as is ConRail) designated as a mixed-ownership Government corporation. Government financial assistance to Amtrak has taken two forms--grants and loan guarantees, authorized by 45 U.S.C. §§ 601 and 602 respectively. In 1972, Congress limited the application of funds obtained under guaranteed loans to capital expenditures. Pub. L. No. 92-316 (June 22, 1972), § 9, 86 Stat. 227, 231. See our decisions at B-175155, September 29, 1972; B-175155(2), April 22, 1975. Sections 601 and 602 were most recently amended by the Amtrak Improvement Act of 1975, Pub. L. No. 94-25 (May 26, 1975), §§ 10 and 11, 89 Stat. 90, 92. Pertinent portions of the current version of sections 601 and 602 are set forth below: "§ 601. Authorization of appropriations "(a) There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for the benefit of the Corporation in fiscal year 1971, $40,000,000, and in subsequent fiscal years through June 30, 1975, a total of $597,300,000. There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for the benefit of the Corporation (1) for the payment of operating expenses for the basic system, and for operating and capital expenses of intercity rail passenger service provided pursuant to section 563(b) of this title, $350,000,000 for fiscal year 1976, $105,000,000 for the transition period of July 1, 1976, through September 30, 1976 (hereafter in this section referred to as the 'transition period') and $355,000,000 for fiscal year 1977; and (2) for the payment of capital expenditures of the basic system, $110,000,000 for fiscal year 1976; $25,000,000 for the transition period; and $110,000,000 for fiscal year 1977. Of the amounts authorized by clause (1) of the preceding sentence, not more than $25,000,000 for fiscal year 1976, $7,000,000 for the transition period, and $30,000,000 for fiscal year 1977 shall be available for payment of operating and capital expenses of intercity rail passenger service provided pursuant to section 563(b) of this title. Funds appropriated pursuant to such authorization shall be made available to the Secretary B-175155 during the fiscal year for which appropriated and shall "$602. Guarantee of loans "(a) The Secretary is authorized, on such terms and Pub. L. No. 94-25 did not provide any additional loan authority, the ceiling remaining at $900,000,000 [45 U.S.C. § 602(d)], and, for the first time, provided specific authorization for capital grants under section 601. H. R. Rep. No. 94-119, 7 (1975). The basic appropriation for grants to Amtrak for the current fiscal year is contained in title I, Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 1976, and the period ending September 30, 1976, Pub. L. No. 94-134 (November 24, 1975), 89 Stat. 695, 704: "GRANTS TO THE NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION "To enable the Secretary of Transportation to make B-175155 "For 'Grants to the National Railroad Passenger Corporation for the period July 1, 1976, through September 30, 1976, $124,700,000, to remain available until expended, of which not more than $99,700,000 shall be available for operating losses incurred by the Corporation." These amounts include the amounts authorized by Pub. L. No. 94-25 for capital grants. H.R. Rep. No. 94-331, 32 (1975). In addition, Congress made supplemental railroad appropriations o March 30, 1976, by Pub. L. No. 94-252, 90 Stat. 293, providing for add tional grants to Amtrak as follows: "For additional amounts for 'Grants to the National The Amtrak appropriations were added by the Senate and originally included $85,182,956 as the "cost specified in the final system plan *** for the purchase of the Northeast Corridor." S. Rep. No. 94-637, 3 (1976). As noted previously, this amount had been authorized by Pub. L. No. 94-210. The conference committee deleted this item, commenting as follows: "The issue of lease or purchase of the Northeast Corridor H.R. Rep. No. 94-941, 6 (1976). The debate on the conference report on the Senate floor contained the following explanatory comments: B-175155 "Mr. President, the Senate version of this resolution contained $85.2 million which would have allowed Amtrak to purchase the Northeast Corridor mainline from ConRail on April 1. We felt very strongly that Amtrak should have ownership of the track over which it had primary operating responsibility and where they will have control over the improvement program. The House conferees were adamant in their feeling that this bill should not contain that 'unbudgeted' amendment since it would cause the resolution to be some $100 million over the budget. After long hours of debate over this amendment in conference, it became clear that the only way to complete it was to delete the funding for this purchase but to include language in the report making it clear that the parties involved, ConRail and Amtrak, still have the option of working out either a purchase or a lease of this track. I understand they are about to complete negotiations on a purchase over time, which requires no appropriations at this time, but will cause Amtrak to incur future increased costs which must be funded. However, should a reprogramming of fiscal 1976 Amtrak appropriations be necessary to fulfill a purchase agreement, the committee has no objection to such action. "Furthermore, the conferees recognized that Amtrak and ConRail are executing an agreement that will provide for the transfer of title to the Northeast Corridor on conveyance date in exchange for an adjustment in the moneys that ConRail would otherwise owe to Amtrak as a result of ConRail's need for trackage rights over the corridor properties for freight operations. This is an arrangement that the conferees view with favor, and feel that it provides a good middle ground between the need for Amtrak to own the properties as of conveyance date and the administration's desire not to fund any substantial improvements in rail passenger service. While I would have personally favored an appropriation of the full amount to purchase these properties right now, I feel that the essential goal of Amtrak owning the properties it will be operating and improving in conjunction with the Federal Railroad Administration can be fulfilled adequately under this arrangement. |