Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1970 (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration).: Hearings Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, Ninety-first Congress, Second Session. July 28 and 29, 1970U.S. Government Printing Office, 1970 - 164 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 27
Page 32
followed in the case of the Environmental Protection Agency where a separate agency is created , do you know any reason why a separate agency is not being recommended in the case of NOAA ? Mr. LENNON . I cannot find any definitive ...
followed in the case of the Environmental Protection Agency where a separate agency is created , do you know any reason why a separate agency is not being recommended in the case of NOAA ? Mr. LENNON . I cannot find any definitive ...
Page 34
Originally were you one of those who felt that NOAA should be a separate agency ? Mr. MOSHER . I am not going to express any personal judgment on EPA . But on NOAA , I agree with Mr. Lennon . I am a realist and pragmatist in this .
Originally were you one of those who felt that NOAA should be a separate agency ? Mr. MOSHER . I am not going to express any personal judgment on EPA . But on NOAA , I agree with Mr. Lennon . I am a realist and pragmatist in this .
Page 84
You just cannot separate the functions completely and either transfer them as entire entities into NOAA or allow them to go where they should be , in Interior . Mr. ERLENBORN . Would the chairman yield ? Mr. BLATNIK . Yes .
You just cannot separate the functions completely and either transfer them as entire entities into NOAA or allow them to go where they should be , in Interior . Mr. ERLENBORN . Would the chairman yield ? Mr. BLATNIK . Yes .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action activities addition Administration affairs agency appear areas Assistant Association authority basic believe BLATNIK budget Bureau of Commercial Chairman Coast coastal zone Commercial Fisheries Commission committee concerned Congress conservation continue coordination Council create Department of Commerce Director economic effective effort engineering environment environmental establishment Executive existing exploitation fact Federal fish Fisheries and Wildlife functions further going Government HOLIFIELD House important independent industry Institute interest Interior John July Lakes land legislation major marine matter ment Michigan National Oceanic natural resources NOAA Oceanic and Atmospheric Oceanography Office Operations organization pollution present President problems proposed protection question reason recommended record Reorganization Plan representatives require responsibility Science scientific Secretary separate Service Sport Fisheries staff statement Stratton STROUD subcommittee Thank tion transfer understand United Washington