The Yale Law Journal, Volume 88, Part 2Yale Law Journal Company, 1979 - Electronic journals |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 76
Page 1631
... Limited to a Single Amendment The most stringent limitation upon a convention would be a con- gressional requirement that it consider only a draft amendment , the wording of which had been ordained in advance by the applying state ...
... Limited to a Single Amendment The most stringent limitation upon a convention would be a con- gressional requirement that it consider only a draft amendment , the wording of which had been ordained in advance by the applying state ...
Page 1636
... limited convention are valid . Professor Charles Black argues that , " [ s ] tate requests for a limited convention create no obliga- tion under Article V , since they are not applications for the thing which , and only which , the ...
... limited convention are valid . Professor Charles Black argues that , " [ s ] tate requests for a limited convention create no obliga- tion under Article V , since they are not applications for the thing which , and only which , the ...
Page 1637
... limited to considering the suggested draft amendment . Before summoning a convention , Congress ought to be confident that those who applied for the convention did so with a ... limited to such specific and exclusive 1637 Limited Conventions.
... limited to considering the suggested draft amendment . Before summoning a convention , Congress ought to be confident that those who applied for the convention did so with a ... limited to such specific and exclusive 1637 Limited Conventions.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adjudication administrative affirmative defense after-acquired property Amendment analysis applicants arbitration Areeda Article attorney authority bargaining basis behavior Branzburg burden cert claim clause CODE ANN complaints Congress constitutional convention corporation costs credit scoring creditors crime criminal custody debtor decision decisionmaking defendant derivative suits discrimination dispute divorce due process economic effect evidence fact federal FERC grievance Hearings hereinafter cited individual infra inmates internal sanctions involved issue judges judicial jurisdiction Justice legislature liability limited litigation loan magistrate master mens rea ment MODEL PENAL CODE officials parties PENAL person plaintiff portrayal predatory pricing prediction presumption priority prison problems procedural proof proposed protection purchase money reference regulation risk role rule scoring security interest shareholders social standard STAT statute statutory substantive substantive due process suggests Supp supra note Supreme Court tion Title IX United utilities Winship YALE L.J.