Page images
PDF
EPUB
[merged small][ocr errors]

Examples of some of the issue areas included in the analysis are: 1) the legal and institutional issues resulting from rapid technological change; 2) the technological issues that result from the impact that intellectual property law might have on technology; 3) socio-political issues arising from the public/private aspects of information; 4) the economic issues arising from the enhanced value of information and information services; 5) the international issues resulting from the increased flow and value of information across national boundaries; and 6) the ethical issues arising from the conflict between public laws and private practices.

Legislation:

[ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]

H.R. 384, a bill to amend Title 17 of the United States Code to exempt the private noncommercial recording of copyrighted works on video recorders from copyright infringement.

H.R. 745, the National Technology Foundation Act of 1985

S. 64, the Uniform Patent Procedures Act of 1985

S. 339, the International Computer Software Protection Act of 1985
H.R. 1176, the Small Business Independent Inventor Patent Fee
Assistance Act of 1985

S. 658, a bill to establish a commission to study and make
recommendations on the desirabilitiy and feasibility of amending the
copyright laws to compensate authors for the not-for-profit lending
of their works

S. 65 and H.R. 695, the Federal Laboratory Technology Utilization
Act of 1985

H.R. 1900, the Design Protection Act of 1985

S. 923 and H.R. 1928, the Department of International Trade and
Industry Act of 1985

S. 1230, a bill to amend the patent laws implementing the Patent
Cooperation Treaty

H.R. 1572, the Federal Science and Technology Transfer Act of 1985
H.R. 2784, the Copyright Dispute Resolution and Royalty Court Act of
1985

H.R. 2752, the Copyright Royalty Tribunal Sunset Act of 1985

S. 1358, a bill to amend Title 35 of the United States Code to
provide for enforcement by the United States in certain cases
S. 1384, the Copyright Holder Protection Act of 1985

Requested by:

Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights,
and Trademarks

House Committee on the Judiciary, and its Subcommittee on Courts, Civil
Liberties, and the Administration of Justice

Projected Delivery Date to TAB: December 1985

NEW COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY: IMPLICATIONS FOR PRIVACY AND SECURITY

The federal government, the largest single user of information technology equipment, is facing major changes in the nature and uses of communications technology. New generations of products such as local and

-

[blocks in formation]

each

integrated with computers, and satellite and fiber optic transmission bring much greater capability to managers and users for accessing, manipulating, and transmitting information. In addition, the government, like the private sector, is rapidly expanding the number of ways in which it uses information technology to accomplish its business. At the same time, the industries and institutions that develop and sell these products are changing, forcing major adjustments in government management strategy.

These new capabilities and uses challenge the integrity of the government's information system. This study is evaluating two sets of these challenges that are essentially opposite sides of the same coin; the implications of increasingly advanced telecommunications systems for the privacy of workers; and the security and vulnerability of these systems to unauthorized use or disruption. The study examines new and prospective capabilities of communications technology, assess their impact on privacy and security, and analyze how the combination of technical, administrative, and legal safeguards can cope with privacy and security implications.

Legislation:

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

Counterfeit Access Device and Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1984 (P.L. 98-473)

Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (P.L. 90-351, as
passed)

Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (P.L. 95-511, as
passed)

The Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1985 (H.R. 3378; S.
1667)

Federal Telecommunications Act of 1985 (H.R. 502)

Requested by:

House Committee on Government Operations

House Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Civil and
Constitutional Rights

Projected Delivery Date to TAB: September 1986

WASTES IN THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT:

THEIR MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL

Due to lower disposal costs relative to other alternatives, and increasing public opposition to land-based disposal alternatives, it is likely that pressure to use the ocean for waste disposal will continue or increase. As coastal areas of the United States have become more developed, the amounts of sewage sludge generated from municipal treatment plants and of dredged material from ports and harbors have increased. Disposal of both waste types, especially sewage sludge, at ocean dumpsites has been controversial but also has increased markedly in the last few decades. There also have been proposals to use the oceans for the disposal of different types of nuclear waste and for at-sea incineration of hazardous synthetic organics such as PCB's.

The assessment is examining the different technologies used or proposed

132

sewage sludge, dredged material, low- and high-level radioactive waste, and some industrial wastes that are compatible with ocean disposal. The study is addressing policy issues related to the role of the oceans within an overall waste management context, alternative strategies for managing these wastes in coastal areas, the pretreatment of wastes prior to disposal, and research and development priorities. The environmental, economic, international, and institutional implications of different policy options will be evaluated.

Requested by:

House Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries, and its Subcommittee on Merchant Marine, and its Subcommittee on Oceanography

House Committee on Public Works and Transportation, and its Subcommittee on Water Resources

Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

Projected Delivery Date to TAB: October 1986

TECHNOLOGIES TO CONTROL ILLEGAL DRUG TRAFFIC

-

Control of illegal drugs entering the United States from foreign countries is an important part of federal drug law enforcement efforts. The detection and seizure of drugs at U.S. borders depends on a number of advanced technologies, including radar and other sensing devices and specialized ships and aircraft. The Customs Service and the Coast Guard, the two agencies with primary responsibility for monitoring U.S. borders, are devoting an increasing share of their resources to intercepting illegal drugs. A number of other federal agencies including the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Border Patrol, the Federal Aviation Administration, and the Department of Defense assist interdiction programs. Technical and organizational improvements could increase the effectiveness of drug interdiction efforts. There are proposals to purchase additional equipment for Customs Service and Coast Guard programs; to develop and introduce new, more sophisticated technical systems; and to increase military assistance through the loan of military hardware and greater participation of armed forces personnel in drug control activities. This assessment is evaluating current and proposed technologies for drug interdiction, their cost-effectiveness, and their most appropriate use in controlling illegal drug traffic.

Legislation:

о Posse Comitatus Act (18 USC 1385)

[merged small][ocr errors]

National Narcotics Act (Title XIII OF P.L. 98-473)

State and Local Narcotics Control Assistant Act of 1984
(H.R. 526/S. 15)

International Narcotics Control Act of 1985 (S. 766)

Related Legislative Activity:

O National Defense Authorization Act FY 1986 (S. 1160)

[ocr errors]

Readiness Enhancement of Air Force Reserve Special Operations
Act of 1985 (H.R. 13077S. 531)

[ocr errors]

133

Authorization and Appropriation Bill for three principal agencies: the Drug Enforcement Agency, the U.S. Coast Guard the U.S. Customs Service

[blocks in formation]

Ensuring public safety during transportation of hazardous materials and wastes has been of increasing concern for some time. Undocumented estimates of the quantity of hazardous commodities shipped annually range to 4 billion tons. Given the estimates of the large quantities shipped, the safety record is good. However, great damage does occasionally occur. A primary government interest is ensuring public and environmental safety while facilitating movement of these commodities vital to the nation's economy. This assessment is directed toward three fundamental issues: 1) the adequacy of containers used in the transportation of hazardous materials; 2) the adequacy of the information systems used to track commodity transport and keep safety records for planning purposes and regulation; and 3) the appropriate levels of training for personnel responsible for the transportation of hazardous materials emergency response.

Interim Deliverables:

State and Local Activities in Transportation of Hazardous
Materials (Background Paper)

Legislation:

[ocr errors][ocr errors]

Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation:
Hazardous Materials Transportation Acts and Amendments (P.L. 94-474)
House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Commerce,
Transportation, and Tourism and House Committee on Public Works and
Transportation, Subcommittee on Surface Transportation: H.R. 966
and H.R. 1146. To amend the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act
to provide for the establishment of regional training centers to
train State and local personnel to respond to hazardous materials
transportation accidents and to enforce State and local hazardous
materials transportation requirements.

House Committees on Energy and Commerce, Interior and Insular
Affairs, Public Works and Transportation: Nuclear Waste

Transportation Satety Act of 1985 (H.R. 1695). To establish
restrictions on the transportation of high-level radioactive waste
and spent nuclear tuel.

Related Legislative Activity

[ocr errors]

Superfund Improvement Act (S.51, H.R. 2780, H.R. 2817)

134

о

Prevent releases of toxic substances and community right to know
(H.R. 1660)

Amend Price-Anderson Act to remove liability limits for nuclear
accidents (H.R. 445)

Requested by:

Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

House Committee on Government Operations, Subcommittee on Government
Activities and Transportation

House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Commerce,

Transportation, and Tourism

House Committee on Public Works and Transportation

Projected Delivery Date to TAB: March 1986

Special Activities of Note

PRIME FARMLANDS IN SURFACE MINE RECLAMATION (Staff Paper)
Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources)

[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors][merged small]

-

THE EFFECTS OF SECTION 3 OF THE COAL LEASING AMENDMENTS OF 1976 (Staff Paper) (Requested by: House Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, and its Subcommittee on Mining, Forest Management, and Bonneville Power Administration.)

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]
[ocr errors]

House Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs: consideration of
proposals to repeal or amend the section 3 nonproduction penalty and
other production requirements for federal coal leases. Section 3
prohibits the issuance of any new onshore federal mineral leases to
any coal lessee and related business entities if the coal lessee
holds a nonproducing federal coal lease and has held it for ten or
more years after August 4, 1986.

Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources:
section 3 legislation.

Projected Delivery Date: December 1985

NURSE PRACTITIONERS: COST AND PAYMENT STATUS (Case Study)
Senate Committee on Appropriations.)

Projected Delivery Date: January 1986

hearings on

[blocks in formation]

MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR CHILDREN (Background Paper)
Senate Committee on Appropriations.)

[blocks in formation]
« PreviousContinue »