Page images
PDF
EPUB
[merged small][graphic][subsumed][merged small][graphic][graphic][merged small]

The great Sun-spot of 1865, from Oct. 7 to Oct. 16. (Howlett.) worth while to denote the fact that on October 16, Chacornac made a drawing of the same spot, corre

sponding so closely with 4, fig. 54, that one might well suppose the two drawings were tracings from one picture. The reader will be prepared to examine with so much the greater confidence the interesting picture

[merged small][graphic][merged small]

of a spot with the surrounding faculæ (fig. 55), drawn by M. Chacornac. He will recognise also the close correspondence between the appearance of the region

Unfortunately such extreme accuracy of delineation is not ordinarily to be met with among solar observers.

around this spot and Sir William Herschel's description of the faculæ (p. 180).

We owe to Mr. Dawes the detection in certain spots of a rotatory motion, as though these regions were the scene of some tremendous solar tornado. A spot of enormous dimensions was observed by him to have rotated through half a complete circuit in the

[merged small][graphic]

A spot presenting the appearance of cyclonic motion. (Secchi.)

course of about six days. Other spots have exhibited an even more rapid motion, and the spectroscopic observations made by Mr. Lockyer on parts of the Sun near the limb (where such cyclonic motions would necessarily involve a rapid motion towards and from the eye) seem to place beyond question the existence of solar tornadoes having a velocity of 40 or 50, in some cases even 120 miles per second. So that we

need no longer regard (with Spörer) the whirling appearance noticed in the accompanying drawing by Fr. Secchi (fig. 56) as due to optical illusion.

The immense dimensions of some spots well deserve thoughtful consideration. When we remember that the least spot which could be perceived with the most powerful telescope must have an area of at least 50,000 miles, it will be understood how enormous these spots must be which have been distinctly visible to the unaided eye.* But we have trustworthy

measurements to refer to in this matter. Pastorff, in 1828, measured a spot whose umbra had an extent four times greater than the Earth's surface. In August 1859, a spot was measured by Newall which had a diameter of 58,000 miles—that is, exceeding more than seven times the diameter of our Earth. But spots of even greater dimensions have been observed. In June

1843, a spot was visible, which, according to Schwabe's measurements, had a length of no less than 74,816 miles. On March 15, 1858, observers of the great eclipse had the good fortune to witness the passage of the Moon over a spot which had a breadth of 107,520 miles. It was in the same year that the largest spot of any whose records have been handed down to us, was visible upon the solar disc. It had a breadth of more than 143,500 miles; so that across it no less than eighteen globes as large as our Earth might have been placed side by side. At a very moderate

* Of the groups shown in Plate II. three were visible to the naked eye, the largest of them (near the centre) being quite conspicuous.

computation of the depth of this solar cavity, it may be assumed that the mass of 100 earths such as ours would barely have sufficed to fill it to the level of the solar photosphere.

During the past two years many spots and groups of enormous extent have been noticed. Those shown in Plate II. may be cited as instances; but others fully as large have lately been observed.

The rapidity with which some spots have changed in figure, or even wholly disappeared, would be wholly incredible were it not that astronomers of the highest repute for accuracy have supplied the records of such changes. Dr. Wollaston says:-'I once saw with a 12-inch reflector a spot which burst in pieces as I was looking at it. I could not expect such an event, and therefore cannot be certain of the exact particulars; but the appearance, as it struck me at the time, was like that of a piece of ice when dashed on a frozen pond, which breaks in pieces and slides on the surface in various directions.'* Biela also notes that spots disappear sometimes almost in a single moment. The converse of such a change has been witnessed by Krone, who observed a spot of no inconsiderable dimensions which sprang into existence in less than a minute of time. On one occasion a momentary distraction caused Sir William Herschel to turn away his

* Of course this description refers only to the appearance which the spots ordinarily present, of being real bodies rather than openings. What Wollaston has described as the breaking up of a spot into pieces, must in reality be looked upon in all probability as the sudden change of a single whirlstorm into a number of smaller ones.

« PreviousContinue »