Reorganization Plan No. 5 of 1966: National Capital Regional Planning Council: Hearing Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, Eighty-ninth Congress, Second Session. August 9, 1966 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 8
Page 6
... indicated , organizations of elected officials in metropolitan areas , such as COG , were made eligible to receive planning grants under the 701 program . With this new source of support , the COG membership - the elected officials of ...
... indicated , organizations of elected officials in metropolitan areas , such as COG , were made eligible to receive planning grants under the 701 program . With this new source of support , the COG membership - the elected officials of ...
Page 15
... indicate that you are putting more emphasis on that than you are on water pollution ? Mr. TUCHTAN . Not necessarily . Mr. Scheiber , I think , can discuss organization structure and facets of operation , if you don't mind . He can ...
... indicate that you are putting more emphasis on that than you are on water pollution ? Mr. TUCHTAN . Not necessarily . Mr. Scheiber , I think , can discuss organization structure and facets of operation , if you don't mind . He can ...
Page 17
... indicated , our budget is $ 856,000 , of which $ 230,000 represents the local contribution , and the balance represents ... indicate a preference for the recognition of Mr. Roberts . He is the young man we think will be able to help us ...
... indicated , our budget is $ 856,000 , of which $ 230,000 represents the local contribution , and the balance represents ... indicate a preference for the recognition of Mr. Roberts . He is the young man we think will be able to help us ...
Page 20
... indicate you were successful in persuading the Federal administration to construct the interceptor or sewer below ... indicated , a statement of a plan which was not carried out , in part through 20 REORGANIZATION PLAN NO . 5 OF 1966.
... indicate you were successful in persuading the Federal administration to construct the interceptor or sewer below ... indicated , a statement of a plan which was not carried out , in part through 20 REORGANIZATION PLAN NO . 5 OF 1966.
Page 23
... indicate to you that the Council of Governments welcomes the opportunity to undertake the added responsibilities which will repose in it with the abolition of the National Capital Regional Planning Council and to explain to the ...
... indicate to you that the Council of Governments welcomes the opportunity to undertake the added responsibilities which will repose in it with the abolition of the National Capital Regional Planning Council and to explain to the ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abolished activities advisory air pollution amended areawide Arlington County ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Babson board of directors Bosley budget Bureau Capital Planning Act Capital Planning Commission Capital Region Transportation Capital Regional Planning carried Chairman DAWSON COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT comprehensive planning comprehensive regional planning Congress cooperative coordinated Council of Governments deputy executive director District of Columbia elected officials eligible environmental health ERLENBORN Fairfax County Federal agency Federal funds Federal Government Federal installations Federal interest gentlemen HENDERSON HOLIFIELD Housing and Urban jurisdictions LASTNER liaison function LOHMAN Maryland ments Metropolitan Council metropolitan planning Metropolitan Washington Council National Capital area National Capital Planning National Capital Regional NCPC politan prepared statement President question Region Transportation Planning regional planning agencies Regional Planning Council regional planning function reorganization plan representatives REUSS ROSENTHAL SCHEIBER SEIDMAN sewer staff suburbs tion Transportation Planning Board TUCHTAN Urban Development Act Washington area water pollution water supply