National War Agencies Appropriation Bill for 1945: Hearings ... 78th Congress, 2d Session |
Common terms and phrases
additional Admiral LAND agencies amount appropriation Army asking assistant average Budget Bureau CAWLEY civilian Colonel MITCHELL committee Congress conscientious objectors contracts cost DAVIES Defense Department Director Division employees equipment estimate expenses facilities February 29 field figure fiscal year 1944 funds GILL GLADIEUX going Government HERSHEY increase Industrial specialist July June 30 KHEEL Labor Board lend-lease Liberty ships loans LUDLOW man-years Manpower Commission Maritime Commission materials MAVERICK ment military months National Navy NELSON Office operating organization percent personnel petroleum Plants Corporation POWERS present PRICE problems procurement Production Board projects RABAUT record regional representative requested Research salary Shipping Administration SKEELS Smaller War Plants statement supply TABER things tion transportation United vessels Vice Chairman wage War Labor Board War Manpower Commission War Production Board War Shipping Administration Washington WIGGLESWORTH
Popular passages
Page 833 - We certify, that the above is a true and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors, of Tex-La Electric Cooperative, Inc., at a special meeting held in Alexandria, La., on July 3, 1958.
Page 440 - ... whenever it appears to the Secretary that such insurance adequate for the needs of the water-borne commerce of the United States cannot be obtained on reasonable terms and conditions from companies authorized to do an insurance business in a State of the United States.
Page 432 - Navy, deliveries of material under — (A) contracts or orders for the Government of any country whose defense the President deems vital to the defense of the United States under the terms of the Act of March 11, 1941, entitled "An Act to promote the defense of the United States...
Page 430 - ... not the minimum. It is the responsibility of the issuing official to authorize only such per diem rates as are justified by the nature of the travel. Care should be exercised to prevent the fixing of a per diem rate in excess of that required to meet the necessary authorized expenses.
Page 262 - ... the War Labor Board and the National Labor Relations Board, of course, I would say no, because, you cannot have a tripartite agency trying the sort of issues that come up before the National Labor Relations Board. A tripartite agency would not be suitable for that purpose at all: Mr. WIGGLKSWORTH. Mr. Chairman, I think I would like to put this article in the. record, if there is no objection. The CHAIRMAN. It is a. little bit unusual to insert newspaper articles in the record, but if the gentleman...
Page 435 - Board, (2) actual transportation and other necessary expenses, and not to exceed $10 per diem in lieu of subsistence of persons serving while away from their homes without other compensation from the United States, in an advisory capacity to...
Page 570 - ... the United States Military Academy at West Point, the United States Naval Academy at Annapolis, the United States Coast Guard Academy at New London or the United States Air Force Academy at Colorado Springs.
Page 832 - ... to cooperate to the fullest practicable extent with the Director of Civilian Supply and other appropriate governmental agencies in the issuance of all orders limiting production by business enterprises, with a view to insuring that small business concerns will be most efficiently and effectively utilized in the production of articles, equipment, supplies, and materials for both war and essential civilian purposes.
Page 832 - January 24, 1942, it shall be the duty or' the Chairman of the War Production Board, and he is hereby empowered, through a deputy to be appointed by him, to mobilize aggressively the productive capacity of all small business concerns, and to determine the means by which such concerns can be most efficiently and effectively utilized to augment war production.
Page 530 - It may be more or less than the owner's investment. He may have acquired the property for less than its worth or he may have paid a speculative and exorbitant price. Its value may have changed substantially while held by him.