| Administrative law - 1989 - 620 pages
...individual employed by the Government engaged in assisting the representative for the Government. § 22.34 Evidence. (a) The ALJ shall determine the admissibility...prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by considerations of § 22.32 Office of the Secretary of Labor undue delay or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.... | |
| Administrative law - 2002 - 572 pages
...individual employed by the Government engaged in assisting the representative for the Government. §521.34 Evidence. (a) The ALJ shall determine the admissibility...of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by consideration of undue delay or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. (e) Although relevant,... | |
| Administrative law - 1993 - 684 pages
...individual employed by the Government engaged in assisting the representative for the Government. § 521.34 Evidence. (a) The ALJ shall determine the admissibility...of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by consideration of undue delay or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. (e) Although relevant,... | |
| Administrative law - 2000 - 692 pages
...individual employed by the Government engaged in assisting the representative for the Government. §35.34 Evidence. (a) The ALJ shall determine the admissibility...by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the §35.32 §35.38 issues, or by considerations of undue delay or needless presentation of cumulative... | |
| Administrative law - 1998 - 668 pages
...representative for the Government. §79.34 Evidence. (a) The ALJ shall determine the admlsslblllty of evidence. (b) Except as provided In this part,...by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the 45 CFR Subtitle A (10-1-98 Edition} issues, or by considerations of undue delay or needless presentation... | |
| Administrative law - 2000 - 676 pages
...bound by the Federal Rules of Evidence. However, the ALJ may apply the Federal Rules of Evidence if appropriate, eg, to exclude unreliable evidence. (c)...be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighted by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by considerations of undue... | |
| Administrative law - 1997 - 604 pages
...bound by the Federal Rules of Evidence. However, the ALJ may apply the Federal Rules of Evidence if appropriate, eg, to exclude unreliable evidence. (c)...be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighted by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by considerations of undue... | |
| Administrative law - 1994 - 612 pages
...shall not be bound by the Federal Rules of Evidence. However, the ALJ may apply the Federal Bules oí Evidence where appropriate, eg, to exclude unreliable...relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value ie substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by considerations... | |
| United States. Tax Court - Government publications - 1992 - 704 pages
...Federal Rules of Evidence. However, not all relevant evidence is admissible. For example, even though relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative...danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by consideration of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of... | |
| |