Payment-in-kind Program: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Select Revenue Measures of the Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, First Session, November 3, 1983

Front Cover

From inside the book

Selected pages

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 84 - I withdraw my reservation of objection. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from Texas? There was no objection. The...
Page 84 - The bill was ordered to be engrossed and read a third time, was read the third time, and passed, and a motion to reconsider was laid on the table.
Page 54 - payments" as used in this section shall not include loans or purchases, or any part of any payment which is determined by the Secretary to represent compensation for resource adjustment or public access for recreation.
Page 82 - The Clerk read the title of the bill. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from California?
Page 57 - unless otherwise defined, words will be interpreted as taking their ordinary, contemporary, common meaning.
Page 5 - Under an accrual method of accounting, income is includible in gross income when all the events have occurred which fix the right to receive such income and the amount thereof can be determined with reasonable accuracy.
Page 54 - Notwithstanding any other provision of law — (1) The total amount of payments which a person shall be entitled to receive under one or more of the annual programs established by titles IV, V, and VI of this Act for the 1974 through 1977 crops of the commodities shall not exceed $20,000. (2) The term "payments...
Page 32 - ISSUES, RESOURCES, COMMUNITY, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION, GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee, we are...
Page 57 - Procure agricultural commodities for sale to other Government agencies, foreign governments, and domestic, foreign, or international relief or rehabilitation agencies...
Page 54 - United States v. Vogel Fertilizer Co., 455 US 16, 24 ( 1981 ); United States v. Cartwnght, 411 US 546, 550 (1973). Further, such deference is constrained "by our obligation to honor the clear meaning of a statute, as revealed by its language, purpose, and history.

Bibliographic information