history; perhaps he may be of opinion, by and by, that there was a slight of hand in the crucifixion, and that Christ only counterfeited death.

Mr. A. No, no; have no such fears; he was not crucified by his disciples, but by the Romans and the Jews; and they were in very good earnest. I will prove beyond contradiction that the dead body was fairly laid in the tomb, and the tomb sealed up; and it will be well for you if you can get it as fairly out again.

Judge. Go on with your evidence.

Mr. A. My lord, the crucifixion being over, the dead body was conveyed to the sepulchre; and, in the general opinion, there seemed to be an end of the whole design. But the governors of the Jews, watchful for the safety of the people, called to mind, that Jesus, in his life time, had said, that he would rise again on the third day. It may, at first sight, seem strange, that they should give any attention to such a prophecy, a prophecy big with confidence and presumption, and which, to the common sense of mankind, carried its confutation along with it. And "there is no other nation in the world which would not have slighted such a vain prognostication of a known impostor." But they had warning to be watchful. It was not long before, that the people "had like to have been fatally deluded and imposed on by him in the pretended resuscitation of Lazarus." They had fully discovered the cheat in the case of Lazarus, and had narrowly

escaped the dangerous consequences of it. And though Jesus was dead, yet he had many disciples and followers alive, who were ready enough to combine in any fraud, to verify the prediction of their Master. Should they succeed, the rulers foresaw the consequence in this case would be more fatal than those which before they had narrowly escaped. Upon this account they addressed themselves to the Roman governor, told him how the case was, and desired that he would grant them a guard to watch the sepulchre; that the service would not be long, for the prediction limited the resurrection to the third day; and when that was over, the soldiers might be released from the duty. Pilate granted the request; and a guard was set to watch the sepulchre.

This was not all; the chief priests took another method to prevent all frauds, and it was the best that could possibly be taken;

up

which was, to seal the door of the sepulchre. To understand to what purpose this caution was used, you need only consider what is intended by sealing up doors, and boxes, or writings; is it not for the satisfaction of all the parties concerned, that they may be sure things are in the state they left them, when they come and find their seals not injured? This was the method used by Darius when Daniel was cast into the lion's den; he sealed the door of the den ; and for what purpose? Was it not to satisfy himself, and his court, that no art had been used to pre

serve Daniel? And when he came and saw Daniel safe, and his own seal untouched, he was satisfied ; and, indeed, if we consider the thing rightly, a seal thus used imports a covenant. If you deliver writings to a person sealed, and he accepts them so, your delivery, and his acceptance, implies a covenant between you, that the writings shall be delivered, and the seal whole; and should the seal be broken, it would be a manifest fraud and breach of trust; nay, so strongly is this covenant implied, that there needs no special agreement in the case; it is a compact which men are put under by the law of nations, and the common consent of mankind. When you send a letter sealed to the post-house, you have not indeed a special agreement with all persons, through whose hands it passes, that it shall not be opened by any hand but his only to whom it is directed; yet men know themselves to be under this restraint, and that it is unlawful and dishonourable to transgress it.

Since then the sepulchre was sealed; since the seal imported a covenant, consider who were the parties to this covenant; they could be no other than the chief priests on one side, the apostles on the other to prove this, no special agreement need be shewn ; on one side, there was a concern to see the prediction fulfilled; on the other, to prevent fraud in fulfilling it; the sum of their agreement was naturally this, that the seals should be opened at the time appointed for the resurrection, that all parties

might see and be satisfied whether the dead body was come to life or no.

What now would any reasonable man expect from these circumstances? don't you expect to hear that the chief priests and the apostles met at the time appointed, opened the seals, and that the matter in dispute was settled beyond all controversy one way or the other? But see how it happened, the seals were broken, the body stolen away in the night by the disciples, none of the chief priests present, or summoned to see the seals opened; the guards when examined were forced to confess the truth, though joined with an acknowledgment of their guilt, which made them liable to be punished by Pilate; they confessed that they were asleep, and, in the mean time, that the body was stolen away by the disciples.

This evidence of the Roman soldiers, and the far stronger evidence arising from the clandestine manner of breaking up the seals, are sufficient proofs of fraud.

But there is another circumstance, in the case, of equal weight; though the seals did not prevent the cheat entirely, yet they effectually falsified the prediction according to the prediction, Jesus was to rise on the third day, or after the third day; at this time the chief priests intended to be present, and probably would have been attended by a great multitude; this made it impossible to play any tricks at that time, and therefore the apostles were forced to hasten the plot, and accordingly the resurrection happened a

day before its time; for the body was buried on the Friday, and was gone early in the morning on Sunday.

These are plain facts; facts drawn from the accounts given us by those who are friends to the belief of the resurrection. The gentleman will not call these imaginations, or complain that I have given him schemes instead of evidence.

Mr. B. My lord, I am now to consider that part of the argument upon which the gentleman lays the greatest stress. He has given us his evidence, mere evidence, he says, unmixed, and clear of all schemes and imaginations. In one thing indeed he has been as good as his word; he has proved beyond contradiction that Christ died and was laid in the sepulchre ; for, without doubt, when the Jews sealed the stone, they took care to see that the body was there, otherwise their precaution was useless. He has proved too, that the prediction of Christ concerning his own resurrection, was a thing publicly known in all Jerusalem; for he owns that this gave occasion for all the care that was taken to prevent fraud. If this open prediction implies a fraudulent design, the evidence is strong with the gentleman; but if it shall appear to be, what it really was, the greatest mark that could be given of sincerity and plain dealing in the whole affair, the evidence will be still as strong, but the weight of it will fall on the wrong side for the gentleman's purpose.

In the next place, the gentleman seems to be at a great loss to account for the credit which the chief