Page images
PDF
EPUB

vention.

A COURSE OF LECTURES

IN

GENERAL PATHOLOGY.

INTRODUCTORY LECTURE.

Definition of Pathology as a Science; its dependence on anatomical, chemical, and clini cal observations; its relation to Physiology; Disease, what? prevalence of exterior causation in producing it; symptoms and products of disease are determined by types of healthy structure and function; reaction; arrest or excess of development; norma of disease; query as to disease essentially independent of exterior cause; hereditary developmental diseases; spontaneous declensions of type? influence of Pathology in improving treatment of disease; pleasures and rewards of the study.

GENTLEMEN: In approaching the frontier of a new country, we naturally desire to possess some previous general information as to the objects which will fall beneath our notice; and thus you, to-day, on the threshold of another study, may reasonably expect to be informed by me as to its subject-matter, and limits, and relations.

Pathology (rátovs óyos, the discourse of whatsoever is suffered) etymologically implies the Science of Disease. In inquiring with you at some length in what sense these two words (science and disease) are, or ought to be, used in the definition just given, I believe that I may best fulfil the explanatory objects of an introductory lecture.

Hereafter, I shall have something to say of the word disease; meanwhile, I will take for granted that each of you attaches a familiar meaning to the word; and in that sense, for the moment, I will leave it.

The other word, science, is always in our mouths; let us ask with what definite meaning it is used.

If we distinguish an infinite diversity in the objects of sense-if our eyes acquaint us with a thousand grades and combinations of colour-if our palates discriminate manifold differences of taste and flavour-if our ears inform us variously of the pitch and rhythm of sounds-if, through the same or other inlets of sense, we are enabled to recognize the several degrees of cohesion, of weight, of magnitude,

12

RELATION OF PATHOLOGY TO PHYSIOLOGY.

extensive observation; and any endeavour to establish it on another foundation, or to spin it forth from the devices of one's imagination, cannot but prove impotent and fruitless.

Two years ago, I availed myself of the opportunity offered by my commencing connection with this School, to explain at length what I conceived to be the true method of pathological study;* and I endeavoured, on that occasion, to illustrate the manner and the proportion in which the mind and the senses must co-operate (or rather, in which the senses must follow the guidance of the intellect) for the purposes of scientific investigation. Therefore, I refrain from dwelling at present on this subject, and pass to other points, relating rather to the limits and affinities of the science.

The phenomena with which the pathologist has to deal are (as I have already mentioned to you) those which occur in the ancillary studies of morbid anatomy, morbid chemistry, and clinical observation; and it is almost superfluous for me to tell you, that these studies presuppose a knowledge of health. All the phrases of pathological observation imply that knowledge as their standard. When you say, handling an organ,-brain or lung,—that it is hard or soft, or very hard or very soft, you mean that the brain is soft as compared with healthy brain, the lung dense as compared with healthy lung. When you say that a man's pulse is quick, or that his pupil is contracted, you mean quick as compared with a healthy man's pulse, contracted as compared with a healthy man's pupil, under similar circumstances. When you say that colocynth is a purge, or morphia a narcotic, you mean that a healthy man would discharge more feces, or have more sleep, under the influence of these drugs than if left to himself—and

so on.

What, then, you may ask, is the relation of Pathology to Physiology? When the latter word is used in its true (which is also its largest) sense, it includes the former; it implies, namely, the total science of life, whether in health or in disease. In common conversation, however, "physiology" is often restricted to denote only the science of life in health; and it is then used in direct contradistinction from "pathology," as the science of life in disease.

No doubt it is convenient for some purposes, that there should be a division of labour in these subjects; that some men should devote themselves especially to observe and explain the phenomena of the healthy body,-others especially to the task of unfolding the more intricate mysteries of disease; but, gentlemen, whether you consider pathology to be a part of physiology in the act of its application to medicine, or whether you view it as a separate study standing in contrast to physiology, in either case let me impress on you that the science is really one, the method of observation and research one, and that any supposed science of disease must of necessity be crude or fictitious, unless it be a direct deduction from the knowledge of health. Your observations will be utterly valueless, if you do not

* On the Aims and Philosophic Method of Pathological Research: An Inaugural Address delivered at St. Thomas's Hospital. London, 1848.

« PreviousContinue »