To Regulate the Practice of Optometry in the Dist. of Columbia: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Public Health, Hospitals, and Charities...on H.R. 278 and H.R. 5238... |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 47
Page 16
... tell you why . I should be permitted to qualify that , because we feel that the relationship that would exist between an optometrist working for a corporation and the patient would be an unhealthy one . Why ? Because the corporation ...
... tell you why . I should be permitted to qualify that , because we feel that the relationship that would exist between an optometrist working for a corporation and the patient would be an unhealthy one . Why ? Because the corporation ...
Page 22
... tell us about it . Mr. BATES . Wait a minute . I want to ask the witness a question . You have just read from a decision of Justice Luhring of the Dis- trict Court of the United States for the District of Columbia in which he quoted ...
... tell us about it . Mr. BATES . Wait a minute . I want to ask the witness a question . You have just read from a decision of Justice Luhring of the Dis- trict Court of the United States for the District of Columbia in which he quoted ...
Page 24
... tell the people of the community that the ethics in that department are just as high as , and in many instances , I dare say , higher , than they are in so - called private prac- tice in an office building somewhere , because we have ...
... tell the people of the community that the ethics in that department are just as high as , and in many instances , I dare say , higher , than they are in so - called private prac- tice in an office building somewhere , because we have ...
Page 26
... tell you that never have they been instructed what lenses to put on a man . In the second place , prices are held in line by the competition of the stores . Mr. NICHOLS . Could you tell the committee in what way the cor- poration could tell ...
... tell you that never have they been instructed what lenses to put on a man . In the second place , prices are held in line by the competition of the stores . Mr. NICHOLS . Could you tell the committee in what way the cor- poration could tell ...
Page 30
... tell Mr. Smith that 40 years ago the dentists ranked with the barbers , but we do not regard the dentist now other than a professional man . Mr. BYRON . Couldn't you poll your association and get petitions in ? Mrs. WRIGHT . Yes ...
... tell Mr. Smith that 40 years ago the dentists ranked with the barbers , but we do not regard the dentist now other than a professional man . Mr. BYRON . Couldn't you poll your association and get petitions in ? Mrs. WRIGHT . Yes ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
American Optometric Association appeal applicant Association attorneys BATES believe bifocal bill Board of Examiners Board of Optometry Buhl Optical Chairman charge citizens Commissioners committee corporate practice correct court decision defendants department stores District of Columbia employed etrist examine the eyes eyeglasses fact following be inserted give Goldenberg's Haussmann HAVENNER hearing Hecht's Hutton interested jewelry stores Judge Luhring KANSTOROOM KAUFMAN Kohn KRASKIN Lansburgh & Bro legislation lens licensed to practice LYON MARSHALL matter meeting Neill Nichols ocular ophthalmoscope optical department optician optom Optometric Society optometrical departments pathology patient person physician prac practice of optometry practice optometry prescription profession professional provisions question record refracted regulate the practice requirements revoked ROSENBERG SCHULTE secretary-treasurer SHELEY SHIPE slush fund SMITH Stapsy statement TENEROWICZ testimony thing tion told WARRENFELD Washington Woodward & Lothrop yesterday
Popular passages
Page 7 - Board may modify its findings as to the facts, or make new findings, by reason of additional evidence so taken and filed, and it shall file such modified or new findings, which...
Page 7 - ... by the Supreme Court of the United States upon writ of certiorari or certification as provided in sections 239 and 240 of the Judicial Code, as amended (USC, title 28, sees. 346 and 347).
Page 7 - Board, its member, agent, or agency, there to produce evidence if so ordered, or there to give testimony touching the matter under investigation or in question; and any failure to obey such order of the court may be punished by said court as a contempt thereof.
Page 7 - Columbia, within the jurisdiction of which the inquiry is carried on or within the jurisdiction of which said person guilty of contumacy or refusal to obey is found or resides or transacts business, upon...
Page 7 - No objection that has not been urged before the Board, its member, agent, or agency, shall be considered by the court, unless the failure or neglect to urge such objection shall be excused because of extraordinary circumstances.
Page 7 - Each member of the Board shall be a citizen of the United States...
Page 7 - ... and it shall file such modified or new findings, which,, if supported by evidence, shall be conclusive, and its recommendation, if any. for the modification or setting aside of its original order, with the return of such additional evidence.
Page 7 - Columbia, by filing in such court a written petition praying that the order of the Board be modified or set aside. A copy of such petition shall be forthwith served upon the Board, and thereupon the aggrieved party shall file in the court a transcript...
Page 7 - Any person who shall violate any of the provisions of this act shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction, for the first offense shall be fined not less than...
Page 163 - Board, and a copy of the charges, together with a notice of the time and place of hearing, shall be...