To Regulate the Practice of Optometry in the Dist. of Columbia: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Public Health, Hospitals, and Charities...on H.R. 278 and H.R. 5238... |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 38
Page 1
... introduced by Mr. Nichols of Oklahoma , H. R. 5238 , " To regulate the practice of optometry in the District of Columbia . " Without objection , the bills will be inserted in the record . ( H. R. 278 and H. R. 5238 are as follows ...
... introduced by Mr. Nichols of Oklahoma , H. R. 5238 , " To regulate the practice of optometry in the District of Columbia . " Without objection , the bills will be inserted in the record . ( H. R. 278 and H. R. 5238 are as follows ...
Page 7
... introduced by Mr. Nichols of Oklahoma , H. R. 5238 , " To regulate the practice of optometry in the District of Columbia . " Without objection , the bills will be inserted in the record . ( H. R. 278 and H. R. 5238 are as follows ...
... introduced by Mr. Nichols of Oklahoma , H. R. 5238 , " To regulate the practice of optometry in the District of Columbia . " Without objection , the bills will be inserted in the record . ( H. R. 278 and H. R. 5238 are as follows ...
Page 12
... introduced by Representative Smith , and also the bill introduced by Representative Nichols . We have gotten no report from the Medical Society on either bill nor have we received a report from the bar association to which we also ...
... introduced by Representative Smith , and also the bill introduced by Representative Nichols . We have gotten no report from the Medical Society on either bill nor have we received a report from the bar association to which we also ...
Page 13
... introduced , H. R. 278 ; and we have notified the Medical Society that we would change the definition . Other than the definition that they have advised us should be changed , they even complained that we have not made our bill strong ...
... introduced , H. R. 278 ; and we have notified the Medical Society that we would change the definition . Other than the definition that they have advised us should be changed , they even complained that we have not made our bill strong ...
Page 14
... introduced throughout the country it has come under the administration of the State , and the service has improved tremendously to the public . Mr. SCHULTE . I do not know ; that is just a difference of opinion . Here is Lansburgh ...
... introduced throughout the country it has come under the administration of the State , and the service has improved tremendously to the public . Mr. SCHULTE . I do not know ; that is just a difference of opinion . Here is Lansburgh ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
American Optometric Association appeal applicant Association attorneys BATES believe bifocal bill Board of Examiners Board of Optometry Buhl Optical Chairman charge citizens Commissioners committee corporate practice correct court decision defendants department stores District of Columbia employed etrist examine the eyes eyeglasses fact following be inserted give Goldenberg's Haussmann HAVENNER hearing Hecht's Hutton interested jewelry stores Judge Luhring KANSTOROOM KAUFMAN Kohn KRASKIN Lansburgh & Bro legislation lens licensed to practice LYON MARSHALL matter meeting Neill Nichols ocular ophthalmoscope optical department optician optom Optometric Society optometrical departments pathology patient person physician prac practice of optometry practice optometry prescription profession professional provisions question record refracted regulate the practice requirements revoked ROSENBERG SCHULTE secretary-treasurer SHELEY SHIPE slush fund SMITH Stapsy statement TENEROWICZ testimony thing tion told WARRENFELD Washington Woodward & Lothrop yesterday
Popular passages
Page 7 - Board may modify its findings as to the facts, or make new findings, by reason of additional evidence so taken and filed, and it shall file such modified or new findings, which...
Page 7 - ... by the Supreme Court of the United States upon writ of certiorari or certification as provided in sections 239 and 240 of the Judicial Code, as amended (USC, title 28, sees. 346 and 347).
Page 7 - Board, its member, agent, or agency, there to produce evidence if so ordered, or there to give testimony touching the matter under investigation or in question; and any failure to obey such order of the court may be punished by said court as a contempt thereof.
Page 7 - Columbia, within the jurisdiction of which the inquiry is carried on or within the jurisdiction of which said person guilty of contumacy or refusal to obey is found or resides or transacts business, upon...
Page 7 - No objection that has not been urged before the Board, its member, agent, or agency, shall be considered by the court, unless the failure or neglect to urge such objection shall be excused because of extraordinary circumstances.
Page 7 - Each member of the Board shall be a citizen of the United States...
Page 7 - ... and it shall file such modified or new findings, which,, if supported by evidence, shall be conclusive, and its recommendation, if any. for the modification or setting aside of its original order, with the return of such additional evidence.
Page 7 - Columbia, by filing in such court a written petition praying that the order of the Board be modified or set aside. A copy of such petition shall be forthwith served upon the Board, and thereupon the aggrieved party shall file in the court a transcript...
Page 7 - Any person who shall violate any of the provisions of this act shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction, for the first offense shall be fined not less than...
Page 163 - Board, and a copy of the charges, together with a notice of the time and place of hearing, shall be...