To Regulate the Practice of Optometry in the Dist. of Columbia: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Public Health, Hospitals, and Charities...on H.R. 278 and H.R. 5238... |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 50
Page 13
... feel the public is not properly protected . Mr. SCHULTE . In what way ? That does not answer the question . What behavior ? Dr. KRASKIN . What I am giving you is our views in general , but we can go more into details and give you the ...
... feel the public is not properly protected . Mr. SCHULTE . In what way ? That does not answer the question . What behavior ? Dr. KRASKIN . What I am giving you is our views in general , but we can go more into details and give you the ...
Page 14
... feel there is not the proper environment relations existing between the patients and the profession . Mr. SCHULTE . Wouldn't that create a monopoly ? Dr. KRASKIN . No more than dentistry and medicine . Mr. SCHULTE . Medicine has a ...
... feel there is not the proper environment relations existing between the patients and the profession . Mr. SCHULTE . Wouldn't that create a monopoly ? Dr. KRASKIN . No more than dentistry and medicine . Mr. SCHULTE . Medicine has a ...
Page 16
... feel that the relationship that would exist between an optometrist working for a corporation and the patient would be an unhealthy one . Why ? Because the corporation could dictate the policies of that department . In other words , the ...
... feel that the relationship that would exist between an optometrist working for a corporation and the patient would be an unhealthy one . Why ? Because the corporation could dictate the policies of that department . In other words , the ...
Page 20
... feel that my duty is to call the attention of the committee to the fact that a vast amount of important space in the Union itself has held against this system to prevent a corporation from licensing an optometrist , namely , New York ...
... feel that my duty is to call the attention of the committee to the fact that a vast amount of important space in the Union itself has held against this system to prevent a corporation from licensing an optometrist , namely , New York ...
Page 21
... feel this , that the present law protects the public , and the board has any authority to make any fair regula- tions it possibly can make with respect to that protection . Mr. SMITH . They do not have authority to prevent a corporation ...
... feel this , that the present law protects the public , and the board has any authority to make any fair regula- tions it possibly can make with respect to that protection . Mr. SMITH . They do not have authority to prevent a corporation ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
American Optometric Association appeal applicant Association attorneys BATES believe bifocal bill Board of Examiners Board of Optometry Buhl Optical Chairman charge citizens Commissioners committee corporate practice correct court decision defendants department stores District of Columbia employed etrist examine the eyes eyeglasses fact following be inserted give Goldenberg's Haussmann HAVENNER hearing Hecht's Hutton interested jewelry stores Judge Luhring KANSTOROOM KAUFMAN Kohn KRASKIN Lansburgh & Bro legislation lens licensed to practice LYON MARSHALL matter meeting Neill Nichols ocular ophthalmoscope optical department optician optom Optometric Society optometrical departments pathology patient person physician prac practice of optometry practice optometry prescription profession professional provisions question record refracted regulate the practice requirements revoked ROSENBERG SCHULTE secretary-treasurer SHELEY SHIPE slush fund SMITH Stapsy statement TENEROWICZ testimony thing tion told WARRENFELD Washington Woodward & Lothrop yesterday
Popular passages
Page 7 - Board may modify its findings as to the facts, or make new findings, by reason of additional evidence so taken and filed, and it shall file such modified or new findings, which...
Page 7 - ... by the Supreme Court of the United States upon writ of certiorari or certification as provided in sections 239 and 240 of the Judicial Code, as amended (USC, title 28, sees. 346 and 347).
Page 7 - Board, its member, agent, or agency, there to produce evidence if so ordered, or there to give testimony touching the matter under investigation or in question; and any failure to obey such order of the court may be punished by said court as a contempt thereof.
Page 7 - Columbia, within the jurisdiction of which the inquiry is carried on or within the jurisdiction of which said person guilty of contumacy or refusal to obey is found or resides or transacts business, upon...
Page 7 - No objection that has not been urged before the Board, its member, agent, or agency, shall be considered by the court, unless the failure or neglect to urge such objection shall be excused because of extraordinary circumstances.
Page 7 - Each member of the Board shall be a citizen of the United States...
Page 7 - ... and it shall file such modified or new findings, which,, if supported by evidence, shall be conclusive, and its recommendation, if any. for the modification or setting aside of its original order, with the return of such additional evidence.
Page 7 - Columbia, by filing in such court a written petition praying that the order of the Board be modified or set aside. A copy of such petition shall be forthwith served upon the Board, and thereupon the aggrieved party shall file in the court a transcript...
Page 7 - Any person who shall violate any of the provisions of this act shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction, for the first offense shall be fined not less than...
Page 163 - Board, and a copy of the charges, together with a notice of the time and place of hearing, shall be...