To Regulate the Practice of Optometry in the Dist. of Columbia: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Public Health, Hospitals, and Charities...on H.R. 278 and H.R. 5238... |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 33
Page 26
... cost you $ 1.30 for certain pair of lens , it cost about $ 1.30 for the wrong lens and $ 1.30 for the right lens . And so it would be absolutely , and unnecessary to substitute the wrong lens . We have too much at stake to give the ...
... cost you $ 1.30 for certain pair of lens , it cost about $ 1.30 for the wrong lens and $ 1.30 for the right lens . And so it would be absolutely , and unnecessary to substitute the wrong lens . We have too much at stake to give the ...
Page 28
... cost to them- selves . Senate bill No. 70 would deny the people this privilege and force them to patronize an ... cost to the patron is probably less . There is definitely a place for syndi- cate practice , honestly conducted , in the ...
... cost to them- selves . Senate bill No. 70 would deny the people this privilege and force them to patronize an ... cost to the patron is probably less . There is definitely a place for syndi- cate practice , honestly conducted , in the ...
Page 35
... cost to them- selves . Senate bill 70 would deny the people this privilege and force them to patronize an optometrist or physician . The recent California act , which this bill follows , does not go far , preserving the exemption as to ...
... cost to them- selves . Senate bill 70 would deny the people this privilege and force them to patronize an optometrist or physician . The recent California act , which this bill follows , does not go far , preserving the exemption as to ...
Page 36
... cost to the patron is probably less . There is definitely a place for syndicate practice , honestly conducted , in the low - cost field . I would approve provisions to ban fraudulent and deceptive advertising . Expe- rience proves ...
... cost to the patron is probably less . There is definitely a place for syndicate practice , honestly conducted , in the low - cost field . I would approve provisions to ban fraudulent and deceptive advertising . Expe- rience proves ...
Page 38
... cost more . If glasses are not allowed to be handled by optometrists employed by corporations or jewelry stores I do not believe that many of our people could take care of the eyes as they do now . Prices would probably be prohibitive ...
... cost more . If glasses are not allowed to be handled by optometrists employed by corporations or jewelry stores I do not believe that many of our people could take care of the eyes as they do now . Prices would probably be prohibitive ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
American Optometric Association appeal applicant Association attorneys BATES believe bifocal bill Board of Examiners Board of Optometry Buhl Optical Chairman charge citizens Commissioners committee corporate practice correct court decision defendants department stores District of Columbia employed etrist examine the eyes eyeglasses fact following be inserted give Goldenberg's Haussmann HAVENNER hearing Hecht's Hutton interested jewelry stores Judge Luhring KANSTOROOM KAUFMAN Kohn KRASKIN Lansburgh & Bro legislation lens licensed to practice LYON MARSHALL matter meeting Neill Nichols ocular ophthalmoscope optical department optician optom Optometric Society optometrical departments pathology patient person physician prac practice of optometry practice optometry prescription profession professional provisions question record refracted regulate the practice requirements revoked ROSENBERG SCHULTE secretary-treasurer SHELEY SHIPE slush fund SMITH Stapsy statement TENEROWICZ testimony thing tion told WARRENFELD Washington Woodward & Lothrop yesterday
Popular passages
Page 7 - Board may modify its findings as to the facts, or make new findings, by reason of additional evidence so taken and filed, and it shall file such modified or new findings, which...
Page 7 - ... by the Supreme Court of the United States upon writ of certiorari or certification as provided in sections 239 and 240 of the Judicial Code, as amended (USC, title 28, sees. 346 and 347).
Page 7 - Board, its member, agent, or agency, there to produce evidence if so ordered, or there to give testimony touching the matter under investigation or in question; and any failure to obey such order of the court may be punished by said court as a contempt thereof.
Page 7 - Columbia, within the jurisdiction of which the inquiry is carried on or within the jurisdiction of which said person guilty of contumacy or refusal to obey is found or resides or transacts business, upon...
Page 7 - No objection that has not been urged before the Board, its member, agent, or agency, shall be considered by the court, unless the failure or neglect to urge such objection shall be excused because of extraordinary circumstances.
Page 7 - Each member of the Board shall be a citizen of the United States...
Page 7 - ... and it shall file such modified or new findings, which,, if supported by evidence, shall be conclusive, and its recommendation, if any. for the modification or setting aside of its original order, with the return of such additional evidence.
Page 7 - Columbia, by filing in such court a written petition praying that the order of the Board be modified or set aside. A copy of such petition shall be forthwith served upon the Board, and thereupon the aggrieved party shall file in the court a transcript...
Page 7 - Any person who shall violate any of the provisions of this act shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction, for the first offense shall be fined not less than...
Page 163 - Board, and a copy of the charges, together with a notice of the time and place of hearing, shall be...