Code of Federal Regulations: Containing a Codification of Documents of General Applicability and Future Effect as of December 31, 1948, with Ancillaries and IndexDivision of the Federal Register, the National Archives, 1998 - Administrative law Special edition of the Federal Register, containing a codification of documents of general applicability and future effect ... with ancillaries. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 125
... period for submission of the completed Federal program change supplement . This extended submission period may not exceed six months , un- less the Assistant Secretary deter- mines that a state has made a timely and specific showing ...
... period for submission of the completed Federal program change supplement . This extended submission period may not exceed six months , un- less the Assistant Secretary deter- mines that a state has made a timely and specific showing ...
Page 136
... period immediately follow- ing commencement of operations as de- fined in §1953.10 ( b ) of this chapter , a withdrawal proceeding shall be insti- tuted . Examples of a lack of reasonable expectation include but are not limited to the ...
... period immediately follow- ing commencement of operations as de- fined in §1953.10 ( b ) of this chapter , a withdrawal proceeding shall be insti- tuted . Examples of a lack of reasonable expectation include but are not limited to the ...
Page 139
... period of time under these rules shall begin with the first business day following that on which the act , event or development initiating such period of time shall have occurred . When the last day of the period so computed is a ...
... period of time under these rules shall begin with the first business day following that on which the act , event or development initiating such period of time shall have occurred . When the last day of the period so computed is a ...
Page 157
... period stipulated for abatement , re- gardless of whether the 60 day contest period has expired or not . New York has also assured that should the State Labor Department's interpretation be challenged successfully appropriate ...
... period stipulated for abatement , re- gardless of whether the 60 day contest period has expired or not . New York has also assured that should the State Labor Department's interpretation be challenged successfully appropriate ...
Page 194
... period . In the absence of circumstances justi- fying a tolling of the 30 - day period , un- timely complaints will not be proc- essed . [ 38 FR 2681 , Jan. 29 , 1973 , as amended at 50 FR 32846 , Aug. 15 , 1985 ] § 1977.16 Notification ...
... period . In the absence of circumstances justi- fying a tolling of the 30 - day period , un- timely complaints will not be proc- essed . [ 38 FR 2681 , Jan. 29 , 1973 , as amended at 50 FR 32846 , Aug. 15 , 1985 ] § 1977.16 Notification ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accordance with 29 administrative law judge AFL-CIO agency amended amicus curiae amount application Assistant Secretary authority bond Carcinogens certificate clude Code Commission complaint compliance comply computation period copy covered decision Department of Labor determination developmental documents employee benefit employee benefit plan employee's employment enrollment eral ERISA exemption Federal enforcement fiduciary filed funds graph group health plan hearing hours of service individual inspections Internal Revenue Code investment issuer issues July loan means meet ment notice occupational safety Office operations OSHA participants and beneficiaries payment PBGC penalty pension person petition plan administrator plan assets plan's ployee premium procedures proceeding purposes pursuant put option quired reasonable record regulations request respect response retary rules safety and health schedule Secretary of Labor section 18(e sion spect statement submitted Subpart summary plan description tion tive transaction U.S. Department vesting violations