Page images
PDF
EPUB

at least cost to the taxpayer. We don't have significant problems which require a legislative solution. We periodically ask for legislative changes to broaden our operational capability to permit more efficient operations and procedures. We will provide specifics of our legislative program as soon as it is completed.

Mr. ROYBAL. Mr. Wolf.

CHILD CARE PROGRAMS

Mr. WOLF. I want to commend the Chairman too on the question of childcare. It was a new idea and the Chairman was very open to it. It really has been a trend setter. I want to thank the Chairman. Mr. Austin, is there any new authority or resources that Congress can give you, is there anything else that we can do to help to expand this process, particularly for on-site child care?

Mr. AUSTIN. We have developed a program in GSA where we monitor and oversee these operations.

We don't have the statutory authority but in the absence of anybody else addressing themselves to the issue, we are promoting quality through accreditation with the National Association for the Education of Young Children. We are working on developing materials, providing training and technical assistance.

We will probably come to you and our oversight committee, with a proposal, if the administration signs off on it. GSA's new role could be regulatory, oversight and policy setting in terms of operations within the Federal Government.

The most important problem of child care is the cost to the individual. If you look at the demographics far and away the person who tends to use those facilities most often are the GS-9 and above because the individual cost for the GS-5's and GS-7's are out of hand. They just cannot meet those costs. Even in the areas where we are seeing costs significantly lower than what might be in the urbanized metropolitan areas. We have encouraged scholarships, funding from foundations and contributions from the unions, to seek to mitigate costs.

Many corporations have joined the CFC for the purpose of obtaining assistance but we still have a cost problem for the employee. Woe be it if you have two or three children that you need to house in any of these facilities. I am not suggesting a government subsidy to mitigate costs but there has to be a mechanism to reduce costs to the people it is there to serve. I will submit information on child care for the record.

[The information follows:]

CHILD CARE

The most important problem of child care is the complex relationship between affordability, accessibility and quality. The goal of GSA is to address all three components. GSA has an overriding commitment to provide safe, healthy, quality environments for young children.

Local market conditions and the level of income from the fundraising efforts of members of the local Boards of Directors, have produced trends that are not easily generalized. In some cases, only upper-graded employees can access the center; while in other cases, low tuitions and a successful fundraising program may account for greater participation by lower-graded employees. Of concern however, is that lower tuition is generally associated with lower staff salaries and substandard benefit packages. The key is to achieve quality at the same time the affordability issue is being addressed.

Mr. WOLF. I hope you will come to see me about that as well as the authorizing committee.

Mr. AUSTIN. We don't regulate it.

Mr. WOLF. A lot of private sector ones have sliding scales based on ability to pay. This is particularly important for a single parent living on one income. If you can get your people to come by and see me, maybe we can look at some other approach.

If you are a single parent and have two children, a sliding scale or some such mechanism I think would be helpful.

Mr. AUSTIN. We will come up.

Mr. WOLF. I have a number of other questions which I will submit for the record on federal supply service programs.

[The information follows:]

QUESTIONS FOR THE RECORD FROM CONGRESSMAN FRANK R. WOLF

ENERGY EFFICIENT VEHICLES

QUESTION:

In the purchase of Government vehicles, what's the policy with respect to mileage efficiency? energy efficiency of automobiles

-

Does GSA take into account the not just for direct federal cost savings but for increased energy efficiency?

ANSWER:

The GSA policy regarding automobile fuel efficiency is set forth in the Federal Property Management Regulations. A copy of the appropriate sections is enclosed.

[ocr errors]

In summary, GSA has been delegated the responsibility under Executive Order 12375 to ensure that the annual acquisition of vehicles for Federal agencies meets the fleet average fuel economy established by the Department of Transportation. In order to meet these goals, agencies have established controls to screen and manage the orders of their field activities to select the size of vehicle with the highest fuel economy that can still fulfill the job and to balance the requirements for heavier vehicles with lighter, more fuel efficient vehicles.

In order to assist agencies in their planning, a minimum fuel economy is established by GSA each year for each type and size of vehicle. This minimum is selected to be as high as possible while still allowing for competition. This allows an agency to make preliminary calculations knowing that the make awarded the contract will be at least that minimum and could be one or two miles per gallon higher.

A tabulation of the required and achieved fleet average is enclosed. This shows the positive results that have been achieved under the program.

§ 101-38.101-2

# 101-38.101-2 Mandatory provisions af. fecting the acquisition and une of motor vehicles.

(a) Except for those vehicles exempted under the provisions of 10138.101-3(b)(6), all motor vehicles acquired for official purposes by execu tive agencies shall be selected to achieve maximum fuel efficiency and limited to the minimum body size, engine size, and optional equipment necessary to meet agencies' requirements.

(b) Use of Government limousines (class V) and large (class IV) sedans shall be eliminated. Exceptions shall be made only for the President and Vice President and for security and highly essential needs. Executive agencles shall certify all exceptions to the Administrator of General Services.

(c) All classes IV and V sedans shall be replaced by class II or smaller sedans unless a class III is absolutely essential to the agency's mission and certified accordingly to the Administrator of General Services.

(d) Executive agencies are governed by the provisions of 31 U.S.C. 1344 and 1349 and 18 U.S.C. 641 which define and govern the use of motor vehicles for official purposes.

#101-38.101-3 Acquisition of fuel efficient automobiles and passenger light trucks.

(a) This section provides policy and procedures governing the acquisition of fuel-efficient passenger automobiles and light trucks by executive agencies and provides for the administration of a consolidated Federal fleet plan for use in monitoring those acquisitions. This authority is derived from Executive Order 11912, dated April 13, 1976, and Executive Order 12375, dated August 4, 1982, which designate and empower the Administrator of General Services to perform, without approval, ratification, or other action by the President the functions vested in the President by section 510 of the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost

41 CFR Ch. 101 (7-1-90 Edition) Savings Act, as amended (89 Stat. 915, 15 U.8.C. 2010).

(b) The acquisition of passenger automobiles by an executive agency shall be limited to class IA, IB, or II (small, subcompact, or compact) unless the agency certifles to the Administrator of General Services that a larger class vehicle is essential to the agency's mission. The certification shall include the reasons for requiring a vehi. cle larger than a class II, compact.

(1) In compliance with Executive Orders 11912 and 12375, GSA administers a consolidated Federal fleet program to monitor passenger automobiles and light trucks acquired by executive agencies. The program is based upon the actual vehicle leases and purchases of passenger automobiles and light trucks, reported by vehicle class, by executive agencies to GSA. GSA administers the program by maintaining a master record of the miles per gallon ratings for passenger automobiles and light trucks actually acquired by each agency during the fiscal year. The GSA program will be used to verify that each agency's vehicle leases and purchases conform with Executive Order 12375; 1.e., the agency will achieve the fleet average fuel economy for the applicable fiscal year.

(2) The Federal fleet program enables GSA to determine the total fleet average fuel economy achieved by all executive agencies at the end of each fiscal year and to provide management assistance to agencies to ensure compliance with Executive Order 12375. Coples or synopses of actual vehicle Icases and vehicle purchases not procured through the GSA Automotive Commodity Center shall be forwarded to the General Services Administration, ATTN: FBF, Washington, DC 20406, not later than December 1st of each year, in accordance with the requirements set forth in § 101-38.102.

(3) Passenger automobiles and light trucks acqubed by executive agencies must meet the fleet average fuel economy objectives set forth below for the appropriate fiscal year:

412

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

'Established by section 502 of the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act (89 Stat. 902, 15 U.S.C. 2002) and the Secretary of Transportation.

Established by the Secretary of Transportation and mandated by Executive Order 12003 through fiscal year 1981 and by Executive Order 12375 beginning in fiscal year 1982.

Requirements not yet established by the Secretary of Transportation.

(4) The method of calculating the fleet average fuel economy uses harmonic averaging and is specifically required by section 510 of the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act (89 Stat. 915; 15 U.S.C. 2010) and applies to the calculations for passen. ger automobiles and light trucks. A sample of the method used to calculate the fleet average fuel economy is shown below. This information is derived from ine total number of veinicles to be acquired by an agency and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) miles per gallon rating provided by GSA in accordance with 10138.102(a).

Light trucks: 4x2, total number (600) divided

(A) Six-cylinder automatic transmission van wagons and van-panels (200) divided by 17 mpg, plus

(B) Eight-cylinder automatic transmission van and van-panels (75) divided by 16 mpg, plus

(C) Six-cylinder manual transmis sion pick-ups (100) divided by 24 mpg, plus

(D) Six-cylinder automatic transmis sion pick-ups (200) divided by 20 mpg. plus

(E) Six-cylinder automatic transmission sedan deliveries (25) divided by 21 mpg.

[blocks in formation]

31.810- 18.9 (Rounded to nearest 0.1 mpg.)

« PreviousContinue »