Page images
PDF
EPUB

Opinions Per Curiam, Etc.

196 U.S.

Kan v. United States, :186 U. S. 193; Ah How v. United States, 193 U. S. 65; United States v. Sing Tuck, 194 U. S. 161. The Attorney General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General McReynolds for appellant. No brief filed for appellees.

No.-, ORIGINAL. Ex parte: IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS E. BARRETT, PETITIONER; No. - Original. Ex parte: IN THE MATTER OF JOHN P. DOLAN, PETITIONER; and No. -, ORIGINAL. Ex parte: IN THE MATTER OF FRANK GARRETT, PETITIONER. Submitted January 3, 1905. Decided January 9, 1905. Motions for leave to file 'petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied. Mr. Chester H. Krum and Mr. James L. Minnis for petitioners.

No. 140. NG HONG LI, APPELLANT, v. THE UNITED STATES. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. Argued January 20, 1905. Decided January 23, 1905. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed on the authority of Ah How v. United States, 193 U. S. 65, and cases cited. Mr. Max J. Kohler for appellant. The Attorney General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Robb for appellée.

No. 189. F. M. WIRGMAN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. H. H. PERSONS ET AL., RECEIVERS, ETC. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Mo tions to dismiss or affirm and petition for writ of certiorari submitted January 16, 1905. Decided January 23, 1905. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. United States v. Jahn, 155 U. S. 109; McLish v. Roff, 141 U. S. 661; Robinson v. Caldwell, 165 U. S. 359; American Sugar Refining

196 U.S.

Opinions Per Curiam, Etc.

Company v. New Orleans, 181 U. S. 277; Ayres v. Polsdorfer, 187 U. S. 585; Colorado Mining Company v. Turck, 150 U. S. 138; Ex parte Jones, 164 U. S. 691. Case below, 126 Fed. Rep. 449, 454. Petition for a writ of certiorari denied. Mr. F. H. Busbee for appellants. Mr. Norris Morey for appellees.

No. 156. THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY CAL. ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. ROBERT H. THOMPSON. In error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Submitted January 24, 1905. Decided January 30, 1905. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Press Publishing Company v. Monroe, 164 U. S. 105; Ex parte Jones, 164 U. S. 691; Benjamin v. New Orleans, 169 U. S. 161; Rouse v. Letcher, 156 U. S. 47; Gregory v. Van Ee, 160 U. S. 643. Case below, 122 Fed. Rep. 860; 116 Fed. Rep. 832. Mr. John D. Works for plaintiffs in error. Mr. C. C. Wright for defendant in error.

No. 5:0. THOMAS DENNISON, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. GEORGE M. CHRISTIAN. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Nebraska. Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted January 23, 1905. Decided January 30, 1905. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs. Munsey v. Clough, 196 U. S. 364; Hyatt v. Cockran, 188 U. S. 691; Roberts v. Reilly, 116 U. S. 80; Dower v. Richards, 151 U. S. 658; Egan v. Hart, 165 U. S. 188; Blythe v. Hinckley, 180 U. S. 333. Case below, 101 N. W. Rep. 1045. Mr. H. C. Brome in support of motions. Mr. W. J. Connell, Mr. C. J. Smyth and Mr. Ed. P. Smith opposing.

No. 388. EMMA THOMAS ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, V.

Decisions on Petitions for Writs of Certiorari.

196 U. S.

JOSEPH P. BLAIR ET AL. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana. Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted January 30, 1905. Decided February 20, 1905. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Marrow v. Brinkley, 129 U. S. 178; Israel v. Arthur, 152 U. S. 355, 362; Central Land Company v. Laidley, 159 U. S. 103, 112; Harrison v. Morton, 171 U. S. 38; Pierce v. Somerset Railway, 171 U. S. 641. Mr. George Denegre and Mr. Charles Payne Fenner in support of motions. Mr. John G. Johnson, Mr. Elihu Root, Mr. Henry L. Lazarus and Mr. Henry Denis opposing.

Decisions on Petitions for Writs of Certiorari from

December 13, 1904, to February 20, 1905.

No. 454. JAMES L. LOMBARD, PETITIONER, V. ANGLO AMERICAN LAND MORTGAGE AND AGENCY COMPANY (LIMITED); No. 455. B. LOMBARD, JR., PETITIONER, v. ANGLOAMERICAN LAND MORTGAGE AND AGENCY COMPANY (LIMITED); No. 456. CHESHIRE PROVIDENT INSTITUTION, PETITIONER, ‘v. FREDERICK HERBERT RAMSDEN; and No. 457. KEENE FIVE CENT SAVINGS BANK, PETITIONER, v. FREDERICK HERBERT RAMSDEN. December 19, 1904. Petition for writs of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. Mr. Frank

Mr. Frank Hagerman for petitioners. Mr. John A. Eaton for respondents.

No. 470. EDWARD E. BESSETTE, PETITIONER, v. THE W. B. CONKEY COMPANY. January 3, 1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied. Mr. William Velpau Rooker for petitioner. Mr. Jacob Newman, M1. S. 0. Levinson and Mr. B. V. Becker for respondent.

!

196 U. 8.

Decisions on Petitions for Writs of Certiorari.

No. 475. SHEWAN, TOMES & Co., PETITIONER, V. MERCHANTS' BANKING COMPANY (LIMITED). January 9, 1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Mr. Harrington Putnam and Mr. Appleton L. Clark for petitioner. Mr. Frederick M. Brown for respondent.

No. 471. THE CITY OF DAVENPORT, PETITIONER, v. WILLIAM RUSSELL ALLEN ET AL. January 16, 1905. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. Mr. Joe R. Lane for petitioner. Mr. Frederick N. Judson for respondents.

No. 465. CHARLES W. MORSE ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. READING COMPANY, CLAIMANT, ETC. January 23, 1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied. Mr. Eugene P. Carver and Mr. Edward E. Blodgett for petitioners. Mr. Robert M. Morse and Mr. Wm. M. Richardson for respondents.

No. 488. AUGUSTUS L. SHAFFER, PETITIONER, V. THE UNITED STATES. January 23, 1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia denied. Mr. Henry E. Davis, Mr. Wilton J. Lambert and Mr. D. W. Baker for petitioner. The Attorney General and Mr. Solicitor General Hoyt for respondent.

No. 474.. Thomas F. HOLDEN, PETITIONER, v. THE UNITED

Decisions on Petitions for Writs of Cortiorari.

196 U.S.

STATES. January 30, 1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia denied. Mr. R. Ross Perry and Mr. R. Ross Perry, Jr., for petitioner. The Attorney General and Mr. Solicitor General Hoyt for respondent.

No. 490. GEORGE E. LORENZ ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. THE UNITED STATES. January 30, 1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia denied. Mr. Conrad H. Syme, Mr. Samuel Maddox and Mr. Charles A. Douglass for petitioners. The Attorney General, Mr. Solicitor General Hoyt and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Purdy for respondent.

No. 506. MINERAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. WINFIELD SCOTT ET AL. January 30, 1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied. Mr. S. B. Dishman for petitioner. No appearance for respondents.

No. 508. Russia CEMENT COMPANY, PETITIONER. v. ABRAHAM B. FRAUENHAR ET AL. January 30, 1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Mr. John F. Dillon and Mr. John Dane, Jr., for petitioner. Mr. Ralph Nathan for respondents.

No. 511. ALBERT R. MOULTON, PETITIONER, v. GEORGE M. COBURN ET AL. January 30, 1905. Petition for a writ of

« PreviousContinue »