Cases Decided in the Court of Claims of the United States, Volume 92U.S. Government Printing Office, 1941 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 45
Page xv
... 12 Stat . 737 , 741 ; Nunnally Investment Co ... 1887 , March 3 ; 24 Stat . 505 ; Trent Trust Co. , Ltd .. 1898 ... November 23 ; 42 Stat . 227 , 278 , 279 ; Steedman et al .... 1922 , June 10 ; 42 Stat . 624 : 123 Hartsel ...
... 12 Stat . 737 , 741 ; Nunnally Investment Co ... 1887 , March 3 ; 24 Stat . 505 ; Trent Trust Co. , Ltd .. 1898 ... November 23 ; 42 Stat . 227 , 278 , 279 ; Steedman et al .... 1922 , June 10 ; 42 Stat . 624 : 123 Hartsel ...
Page 10
... November 12 which plaintiff received on November 14 , 1932. Plaintiff estimated it would re- quire 45 fair , actual working days to complete the work , and a record was kept of conditions occurring each day permitting work to be done ...
... November 12 which plaintiff received on November 14 , 1932. Plaintiff estimated it would re- quire 45 fair , actual working days to complete the work , and a record was kept of conditions occurring each day permitting work to be done ...
Page 16
... 12. On November 9 , 1932 , plaintiff for the first time men- tioned and suggested that the pool above the dam be low- ered until the cofferdam was placed . It was thereupon informed by defendant's engineer in charge that the pool 5 ...
... 12. On November 9 , 1932 , plaintiff for the first time men- tioned and suggested that the pool above the dam be low- ered until the cofferdam was placed . It was thereupon informed by defendant's engineer in charge that the pool 5 ...
Page 17
... November 9 plaintiff wrote the contracting officer stating that without lowering the pool plaintiff could not build according to its plan which had been submitted on October 22 , 1932. On November 12 the contracting officer , by letter ...
... November 9 plaintiff wrote the contracting officer stating that without lowering the pool plaintiff could not build according to its plan which had been submitted on October 22 , 1932. On November 12 the contracting officer , by letter ...
Page 47
... November 30 , 1936 , the Commissioner notified plaintiffs of his determination of a deficiency in income tax for ... 12 , 1938 . Reporter's Statement of the Case 92 C. Cls . 7. HERBERT RIVINGTON PYNE 47.
... November 30 , 1936 , the Commissioner notified plaintiffs of his determination of a deficiency in income tax for ... 12 , 1938 . Reporter's Statement of the Case 92 C. Cls . 7. HERBERT RIVINGTON PYNE 47.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
additional alleged amount assets August bear traps blister change order claim for refund cofferdam collector Commissioner of Internal Company construction contracting officer contractor corporation cost Court 92 court made special Court of Claims custodian damages December decision deduction defendant defendant's delay delivered the opinion entitled to recover fact as follows findings of fact furnished Goltra Government held hull interest Internal Revenue Isaac G January Judge judgment July June June 16 June 25 June 30 Kekaha shares labor Leesville liquidated damages Macon County March March 15 ment notice to proceed November November 12 October Ohio River overassessment paid parties patent Paul Otto Isenberg payment performed period petition plaintiff plaintiff is entitled prior received reference Reporter's Statement res judicata September special findings specifications Stat statute suit Supreme Court taxpayer thereof tiff tion United United States Navy wickets
Popular passages
Page 47 - The net income of the estate or trust shall be computed in the same manner and on the same basis as in the case of an individual...
Page 372 - Treasury, in the performance of his official duty, and the court certifies that there was probable cause for the act done by the collector or other officer, or that he acted under the directions of the Secretary of the Treasury, or other proper officer of the Government...
Page 357 - It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the attorneys for the above named parties and on their behalf that : "1. Defendant, Miller Brothers Company, is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with its principal place of business at Ninth and King Streets, Wilmington, Delaware.
Page 55 - District, which may require or involve the employment of laborers or mechanics shall contain a provision that no laborer or mechanic doing any part of the work contemplated by the contract in the employ of the contractor or any subcontractor contracting for any part of said work contemplated shall be required or permitted to work more than eight hours in any one calendar day...
Page xxiii - That jurisdiction is hereby conferred upon the Court of Claims to hear, determine, and enter judgments against the United States upon the claims of...
Page 55 - ... a penalty of five dollars shall be Imposed upon the contractor for each laborer or mechanic for every calendar day In which such employee Is required or permitted to labor more than eight hours upon said work without receiving compensation computed in accordance with this article, and all penalties thus Imposed shall be withheld for the use and benefit of the Government...
Page 454 - ... where customary working hours are other than those hereinabove mentioned, the collector of customs is vested with authority to regulate the hours of customs employees so as to agree with prevailing working hours in said ports, but nothing contained in this section shall be construed in any manner to affect or alter the length of a working day for customs employees or the overtime pay herein fixed.
Page 251 - The undersigned agrees, if awarded the contract, to commence the work within calendar days after the date of receipt of notice to proceed, and to complete the work within calendar days after the date of receipt of notice to proceed.
Page 37 - ... the Government may, by written notice to the Contractor, terminate his right to proceed with the work or such part of the work as to which there has been delay. In...
Page 609 - If any sales tax, processing tax, adjustment charge, or other taxes or charges are imposed or changed by the Congress after the date set for the opening of this bid, and made applicable directly upon the production, manufacture, or sale of the supplies covered by this bid, and are paid by the contractor on the articles or supplies herein contracted for...