Page images
PDF
EPUB

even final action, will be received from the carrier, contractor, and/or insurer within ten days after the claim is submitted to them. In the event a response is not received to the claim or to subsequent correspondence, the matter should be reported to the origin transportation officer as a matter bearing upon the adequacy of contractual performance. The origin transportation officer will render assistance in obtaining action from the company and report the actions taken to the claims investigating officer who will monitor the claim against the carrier, contractor, or insurer until a reply has been received from the origin transportation officer.

f. Unjustified denials by the carrier, contractor or insurer.

(1) Government bill of lading carriers.

(a) Action by the claims investigating officer. If a Government bill-of-lading carrier or its insurer has refused to acknowledge or respond to a claim within a reasonable time (normally 30 days if applicable regulations or agreements do not specify another time limit), if the claims investigating officer considers a valid claim to have been denied or no adequate settlement offered, or if there has been a delay in settlement of a claim beyond 120 days, then, in addition to initiation of administrative action as appropriate under Interstate Commerce Commission Regulations, military tender of service, or other applicable regulation or agreement, the matter shall be referred to the adjudicating authority who paid the

21-14a

claim. The referral shall contain a statement of the facts, copies of pertinent correspondence and documents, and the claims investigating officer's opinion as to liability. A copy of the referral letter with enclosures will be sent to the origin-transportation officer. The carrier should be notified of this action by a copy of the referral or by separate correspondence.

(b) Action by the adjudicating authority. The adjudicating authority shall review the entire file and shall make a final demand on the carrier when liability is clear. The final demand shall set forth the exact amount of liability, in view of the supporting evidence, owed by the carrier under the terms of the Government bill of lading, the basis for the determination of the amount demanded, and notification that the demand is a final demand and that the file will be forwarded for involuntary collection by withholding amounts due from the Navy if payment is not received within 30 days. If, after 30 days from the date of the final demand, reimbursement from the carrier has not been received, the case file should be forwarded to the Navy Regional Finance Center, Code FF20, Washington, D.C. 20371, requesting that the amount demanded by the final demand be setoff against subsequent Government bill of lading earnings. The amount of withholding requested must be the amount of the final demand. If the amount of the final demand is in error, a new 30-day final demand must be made. In general, a carrier should not be permitted to continue negotiations after a final demand has been made. If a misunderstanding between the claims investigating officer and the carrier is obvious from the file, negotiation prior to a final demand may be desirable. Under normal circumstances, however, if the claims investigating officer and the carrier have been unable to reach agreement, a final-demand amount should be determined and a final demand made. The carrier should not be permitted to further delay payment of his legal liability by meaningless negotiation.

(2) Nontemporary storage warehousemen.

(a) Action by the claims investigating officer. If a nontemporary warehouseman or his insurer has refused to acknowledge or respond to a claim within a reasonable time, if the claims investigating officer considered a valid claim to have been denied or no adequate settlement offered, or if there has been a delay in settlement of a claim beyond

120 days, the matter shall be referred to the adjudicating authority who paid the claim. The referral shall contain a statement of the facts, copies of pertinent correspondence and documents, and the claims investigating officer's opinion as to liability. The warehouseman should be notified of this action by a copy of the referral letter or by separate correspondence.

(b) Action by the adjudicating authority. The adjudicating authority shall review the entire file and shall make a further demand on the warehouseman or his insurer when liability seems clear. If recovery is not effected within 30 days from this demand, or negotiations likely to result in an adequate recovery are not underway at that time, the file will be forwarded to the appropriate area Military Traffic Management and Terminal Service (MTMTS) Headquarters for a final determination of liability by the officer administering the warehouse man's basic agreement.

(3) Pack-and-crate contractors. When the origin-Navy-personnel-property office, or the destination claims investigating officer on a shipment originating at a non-Navy transportation office fails to receive adequate response or recovery from a packand-crate contractor within 60 days or when a claim is denied by the contractor without sufficient justification, the matter should be referred immediately to the officer administering the contract under which the services were performed. In the case of a shipment originating at a non-Navy transportation office, the referral should be made via the origin transportation office. Each referral will include a full statement, with supporting evidence, substantiating that the contractor's denial of the claim is unjustified or that the settlement offer is inadequate. Due to the relatively short duration of pack-and-crate contracts, it is desirable to expedite processing of unjustified denials.

(4) Other carriers, contractors, or insurers. Unjustified denial by other carriers, contractors, or insurers will be referred by the claims investigating officer to the adjudicating authority. The adjudicating authority will review the entire file and shall make a further demand on the carrier, contractor, or insurer when liability seems clear. If recovery is not received within 30 days from the date of this demand, or negotiations likely to result in an adequate recovery are not underway at that time, the file will be forwarded to the Judge Advocate General for additional recovery action.

21-15 Change 9

the services were performed. In the case of a shipment originating at a non-Navy transportation office, the referral should be made via the origin transportation office. Each referral will include a full statement, with supporting evidence, substantiating that the contractor's denial of the claim is unjustified or that the settlement offer is inadequate. Due to the relatively short duration of pack-and-crate contracts, it is desirable to expedite processing of unjustified denials.

(4) Other carriers, contractors, or insurers. Unjustified denial by other carriers, contractors, or insurers will be referred by the claims investigating officer to the adjudicating authority. The adjudicating authority will review the entire file and shall make a further demand on the carrier, contractor, or insurer when liability seems clear. If recovery is not received within 30 days from the date of this demand, or negotiations likely to result in an adequate recovery are not underway at that time, the file will be forwarded to the Judge Advocate General for additional recovery action.

2122 PREPARATION OF CLAIMS

INVESTIGATING OFFICER'S REPORT

a. General. The claims investigating officer will prepare a written report of investigation including his recommendations. Sufficient copies will be prepared so that the original and two copies may be forwarded to the appropriate adjudicating authority and one copy retained at the command. Only one set of supporting papers, documents, and exhibits need be forwarded to the adjudicating authority. The claims investigating officer may, at his discretion, utilize DD Form 1844 (see Appendix A-21-h) as a worksheet in appropriate cases and attach a copy of the form to his report.

b. Regular claims procedure. The claims investigating officer's report shall include a statement of all additional facts and circumstances not pointed out by the claimant, including any facts overlooked or incorrectly stated by the claimant in his statement of the facts and circumstances of the incident, and specific recommendations regarding any items for which reimbursement in an amount less than the full amount claimed, less normal depreciation, if applicable, is recommended due to preexisting damage, inflated estimates of repair, economically repairable property claimed as beyond repair, salvage value of property, or other factors. Specific recommendations

shall also include designation of those repair and replacement costs for which written estimates have been waived in accordance with section 2117b of this chapter and an explanation of any unusual circumstances justifying nonroutine processing of the claim. Any convenient format can be used for the written report as long as all relevant information is included. Appendix A-21-g shows a sample report. The claims investigating officer will complete and sign part III of DD Form 1842 (see Appendix A-21c(2)) when investigation of the claim is complete. Report control symbol JAG 5890-2 is assigned to this report.

*c. Privacy Act requirements. It is essential that each investigative report reflect that a good faith effort was made to comply with the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. § 552a) and SECNAVINST 5211.5 series. Any indication of noncompliance shall be explained either in the investigative report on the forwarding endorsements and, when required, remedied in accordance with section 0308. The claims adjudicating authority has the responsibility to ensure that remedial action is taken to rectify noncompliance indicated in the investigative report prior to forwarding the report to the Judge Advocate General.

*d. Claims arising from the same incident. A separate report shall be prepared on each claim filed. However, where separate claims arise from the same incident, the claims investigating officer may avoid duplication of effort by completing one detailed report of investigation with all necessary exhibits and documents. He may then incorporate this report and its supporting exhibits by reference. A brief reference to the case (name, case number, date, etc.) in which the detailed report and exhibits may be found shall be included.

*e. Small-claims procedure. When the total amount claimed is $500 or less and the claims investigating officer has determined that all damage or loss claimed was actually incurred, that the amounts claimed are accurate and reasonable, and that the full amount claimed, limited by normal depreciation where applicable, should be allowed, he may complete part II of DD Form 1842 (see Appendix section A-21 c(3)) in lieu of making a more detailed written report. Preparation of DD Form 1842, part II, for certification and signature by the adjudicating authority shall constitute a finding that the claim is properly presented and

21-16

substantiated and a recommendation for payment in full less normal depreciation, if applicable.

*f. Forwarding of claim. For all claims not including enlisted uniform items to be replaced in kind, a claims investigating officer representing a Navy Personal Property Office or Marine Corps Transportation Office may, with the permission of his Commanding Officer, forward the claim file and claims investigating officer's report directly to the cognizant adjudicating authority. All other claims should be forwarded to the cognizant adjudicating authority via the Commanding Officer.

2123 ACTION BY COMMANDING OFFICER

Items of military clothing and related articles which have been lost or destroyed incident to service may be replaced in kind. (See section 2124e.) The items issued need not be new and unused, provided they are in at least as good condition as the lost or

21-16a

« PreviousContinue »