Microbial or other biological agents, or toxins whatever their origin or method of production, of types and in quantities that have no justification for prophylactic, protective or other peaceful purposes; 2 Weapons, equipment or means of delivery designed... Department of Defense Appropriations - Page 167by United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations - 1976Full view - About this book
| United States. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency - Arms control - 1975 - 366 pages
...and in quantities that have no justification for prophylactic, protective or other peaceful purposes, as well as weapons, equipment and means of delivery...toxins for hostile purposes or in armed conflict. Many Parties to the Geneva Protocol have, in their ratification of that Agreement, entered reservations... | |
| United States, United States. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency - Arms control - 1972 - 142 pages
...no justification for prophylactic, protective or other peaceful purposes; (2) Weapons, equipment or means of delivery designed to use such agents or toxins for hostile purposes or in armed conflict. ARTICLE II Each State Party to this Convention undertakes to destroy, or to divert to peaceful purposes,... | |
| U.S. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations, United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Department of Defense - United States - 1975 - 374 pages
...production, stockpiling, or retention of bacteriological agents or toxins, and weapons, equipment, or means of delivery designed to use such agents or toxins for hostile purposes, or in armed conflict. It also provides that each State destroy, or divert to peaceful purposes, all agents, toxins, weapons,... | |
| Robert W. Lambert, Jean E Mayer - Biological warfare - 1975 - 374 pages
...quantities that have no justification for prophylactic or other peaceful purposes; (2) Weapons, equipment or means of delivery designed to use such agents or toxins for hostile purposes or in armed conflict. The British representative observed that the previous inconsistencies on "weapons" and "agents" had... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Appropriations Committee - 1975 - 1742 pages
...weapons, equipment, and means of •'.'.very designed to use such agents or toxins for hostile :-'pciee or in armed conflict. In late 1969, after a review of our chemical and '.-logical warfare policies, the United States renounced the •i<; "of any form" of bacteriological... | |
| DNA - 1982 - 840 pages
...no justification for prophylactic, protective or other peaceful purposes; (2) Weapons, equipment, or means of delivery designed to use such agents or toxins for hostile purposes or in armed conflict." Dr. Ahmed said that a key word, "research," was missing frcm the phrase "to develop, produce, stockpile,... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations - 1976 - 388 pages
...production, stockpiling, or retention of bacteriological agents or toxins, and weapons, equipment, or means of delivery designed to use such agents or toxins for hostile purposes, or in armed conflict. It also provides that each State destroy, or divert to peaceful purposes, all agents, toxins, weapons,... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services - 1977 - 1338 pages
...the BW Convention and the 1925 Geneva Protocol, both of which the United States Senate has ratified. In the BW Convention, the parties undertake not to...toxins for hostile purposes or in armed conflict. As a result, we have destroyed all military stocks of biological warfare agents and munitions. The... | |
| |