Decisions of the Comptroller General of the United States, Volume 46U.S. Government Printing Office, 1968 - Finance, Public Contains a selection of major decisions of the GAO. A digest of all decisions has been issued since Oct. 1989 as: United States. General Accounting Office. Digests of decisions of the Comptroller General of the United States. Before Oct. 1989, digests of unpublished decisions were issued with various titles. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 22
... Schedule v . Price Where the record shows a reasonable basis for the conclusion of the contract- ing officer to award a contract to the second low bidder proposing a more favorable overall delivery schedule on the procurement of helmets ...
... Schedule v . Price Where the record shows a reasonable basis for the conclusion of the contract- ing officer to award a contract to the second low bidder proposing a more favorable overall delivery schedule on the procurement of helmets ...
Page 23
... schedule . You submitted a unit price of $ 85.20 , compared to Sierra's price of $ 85.83 . The respective proposed delivery schedules were as follows : GENTEX May 23-500 SIERRA June 6-500 ( 1000 ) June 20-500 ( 1500 ) June 30-500 ( 2000 ) ...
... schedule . You submitted a unit price of $ 85.20 , compared to Sierra's price of $ 85.83 . The respective proposed delivery schedules were as follows : GENTEX May 23-500 SIERRA June 6-500 ( 1000 ) June 20-500 ( 1500 ) June 30-500 ( 2000 ) ...
Page 24
... scheduled to make one of , its four deliveries . You point out that your delivery schedule can be made to appear equally attractive by limiting the comparison to those days just preceding Sierra's scheduled delivery dates . In addi ...
... scheduled to make one of , its four deliveries . You point out that your delivery schedule can be made to appear equally attractive by limiting the comparison to those days just preceding Sierra's scheduled delivery dates . In addi ...
Page 25
... schedule , even if he has not offered the best price . While your argument concerning the deficiency in the method by which the contracting officer determined the relative advantages of the delivery schedules is not without merit , we ...
... schedule , even if he has not offered the best price . While your argument concerning the deficiency in the method by which the contracting officer determined the relative advantages of the delivery schedules is not without merit , we ...
Page 158
... Scheduled The Sunday premium pay benefits provided under section 405 ( f ) of Public Law 89-504 ( 5 U.S.C. 673c ) for employees whose regular work schedule includes an 8 - hour period of service any part of which is within the period ...
... Scheduled The Sunday premium pay benefits provided under section 405 ( f ) of Public Law 89-504 ( 5 U.S.C. 673c ) for employees whose regular work schedule includes an 8 - hour period of service any part of which is within the period ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acceptance active duty administrative agency Air Force amended amount applicable appropriate Armed Services Procurement ASPR August August 14 August 22 authority award basis bid opening bidder Change Order claim clause Commission Comp compensation concerning considered construction contracting officer contractor cost court December decision Defense Military delay delivery Department Department of Defense determination effect employee entitled evaluation Examiner's expenses fact Federal follows funds furnished Government grade indicated invitation for bids July July 21 June June 28 letter dated limitation liquidated damages ment military negotiation November November 12 October October 13 offerors paragraph patent pay and allowances payment percent performance period prescribed prior proposal provides Public Law pursuant question receipt received record request retired pay schedule Secretary September September 23 small business specifications Stat station statute statutory steam subcontractor submitted temporary tion transportation U.S. Code uniformed services United Veterans Administration
Popular passages
Page 387 - ... after the allowance of such a claim, the ascertainment of the amount due, and the issuing of a warrant for the payment thereof.
Page 448 - The decision of the Secretary or his duly authorized representative for the determination of such appeals shall be final and conclusive unless determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to have been fraudulent, or capricious, or arbitrary, or so grossly erroneous as necessarily to Imply bad faith, or not supported by substantial evidence.
Page 511 - ... unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor, including, but not restricted to, acts of God, or of the public enemy, acts of the Government, acts of another contractor in the performance of a contract with the Government, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, freight embargoes, and unusually severe weather or delays of subcontractors due to such causes...
Page 233 - For the purposes of this section, the use or manufacture of an invention described In and covered by a patent of the United States by a contractor, a subcontractor, or any person, firm, or corporation for the Government and with the authorization or consent of the Government, shall be construed as use or manufacture for the United States.
Page 387 - Any such assignment or reassignment shall cover all amounts payable under this contract and not already paid, and shall not be made to more than one party, except that any such assignment or reassignment may be made to one party as agent or trustee for two or more parties participating in such financing.
Page 30 - Government Property shall not be affected by the incorporation or attachment thereof to any property not owned by the Government, nor shall such Government Property, or any part thereof, be or become a fixture or lose its identity as personalty by reason of affixation to any realty.
Page 451 - That any such decision shall be final and conclusive unless the same Is fraudulent or capricious or arbitrary or so grossly erroneous as necessarily to Imply bad faith or Is not supported by substantial evidence.
Page 233 - Whenever an invention described in and covered by a patent of the United States is used or manufactured by or for the United States...
Page 339 - A small business concern for the purpose of government procurement is a concern, including its affiliates, which is independently owned and operated is not dominant in the field of operation in which it is...
Page 460 - Disputes" clause does not preclude consideration of law questions in connection with decisions provided for in paragraph (a) above: Provided, That nothing in this contract shall be construed as making final the decision of any administrative official, representative or board on a question of law.