Decisions of the United States Department of the Interior, Volume 97U.S. Government Printing Office, 1990 - Natural resources |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 69
Page 18
... parties affected , have the right to appear for and on behalf of any and all interests affected hereby before the Department of the Interior , and to appeal from orders issued under the regulations of said Department * * provided ...
... parties affected , have the right to appear for and on behalf of any and all interests affected hereby before the Department of the Interior , and to appeal from orders issued under the regulations of said Department * * provided ...
Page 25
... parties had initially agreed that the Bureau would deliver 4.84 - acre feet - per - irrigable - acre in exchange for repayment of specified project * The Bureau also obtained water rights from those who had appropriated water for use on ...
... parties had initially agreed that the Bureau would deliver 4.84 - acre feet - per - irrigable - acre in exchange for repayment of specified project * The Bureau also obtained water rights from those who had appropriated water for use on ...
Page 32
... parties . IV . Conclusion In the recent Nevada v . United States decision , the Supreme Court reaffirmed that the beneficial ownership of reclamation project water rights is in the water user who puts the water to beneficial use , and ...
... parties . IV . Conclusion In the recent Nevada v . United States decision , the Supreme Court reaffirmed that the beneficial ownership of reclamation project water rights is in the water user who puts the water to beneficial use , and ...
Page 39
... parties under the OCAP . Such a result could bear on the sustainability of the OCAP now filed with the Nevada Federal District Court . One of the objections to the OCAP filed by TCID was that the OCAP could lead to TCID and the farmers ...
... parties under the OCAP . Such a result could bear on the sustainability of the OCAP now filed with the Nevada Federal District Court . One of the objections to the OCAP filed by TCID was that the OCAP could lead to TCID and the farmers ...
Page 42
... parties : We agree with the district judge that " the conspicuous absence of transfer procedures , taken in conjunction with the clear general deference to state water law impels the conclusion that Congress intended transfers to be ...
... parties : We agree with the district judge that " the conspicuous absence of transfer procedures , taken in conjunction with the clear general deference to state water law impels the conclusion that Congress intended transfers to be ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accord and satisfaction additional royalty adjudication Administrative Judge amended amount appeal appellant's application ASBCA audit authority BIA's BLM's decision Board Bureau cancellation common lessee conflict Congress construction Continental Shelf contract contractor Corp costs Court cyanide determined Director drainage Federal filed fish and wildlife fractionation allowance Gas Leases Government Grand Chenier HCJ's IBIA IBLA Indian Interior irrigation issue June June 19 Lake Charles Landusky Management Mineral Leasing mistake in bid modified Newlands Project NGLP's nonmineral obligation OCAP offset oil and gas Opinion of Solicitor overpayments overruled Pacific R.R. parties placer mining PPCM prior production profit factor project water rights prudent operator pursuant Pyramid Lake reasonable Reclamation fund Reger regulations revenues royalty royalty payments rule Sandy Jones Secretary specific Stat statute Stillwater summary judgment supra survey United vacated water users Zortman