Page images
PDF
EPUB

(No response.)

Mr. SCUDDER. I would like to present Mr. Wallace, Sonoma County engineer.

STATEMENT OF MARSHALL WALLACE, COUNTY SURVEYOR AND ROAD COMMISSIONER, SONOMA COUNTY, CALIF.

Senator MCCLELLAN. You may proceed, sir, if you will first identify yourself to the reporter and state your official position.

Mr. WALLACE. My name is Marshall Wallace. I am the county surveyor and road commissioner of Sonoma County, Calif.

I am appearing before you gentlemen in the interest of the Russian River project which has just been explained to you by the Engineer Corps.

In my official position I am cognizant of these problems. My first experience in this particular position, which I now hold, was in 1937; I have held it since then.

We had a major flood in 1937; we had another in 1940, and another in 1945.

The river running through the agricultural land between Healdsburg and Cloverdale is in need of channel correction and stabilization; this is particularly true adjacent to the town of Geyserville.

I have prepared a statement here which I would like to submit in the interest of time, gentlemen.

Senator MCCLELLAN. Thank you. It may be submitted and printed in full in the record.

(The statement referred to is as follows:)

STATEMENT OF MARSHALL WALLACE, SONOMA COUNTY SURVEYOR AND ROAD COMMISSIONER

Mr. Chairman and gentlemen of the committee, my name is Marshall Wallace. I am the county surveyor and road commissioner of Sonoma County, Calif. I have held this office since March 1937.

I am appearing before you to stress the importance of the Russian River project as submitted by the Army engineers in the matter of flood control. Since the stream and watershed is adequately described in the report, I shall not infringe upon your time by repetition.

Due to my official position, I am cognizant of the flood problems along the Russian River and Dry Creek by reason of personal observation, and cooperation with the Cloverdale and Dry Creek flood-control districts in their efforts to control the streams, with levees and revetments for the protection of farm lands from loss due to floods.

Floods causing severe damage have been recorded in 1937, 1940, and 1945. Subsequent to the 1937 flood, an inventory of flood losses was made in cooperation with the State engineer, which inventory revealed that losses to railways, highways, utilities, industries, farm and recreation properties, etc., in Sonoma and Mendocino Counties, totaled $2,253,219. (A detailed break-down of this inventory is submitted with this presentation-attached.)

Subsequent to 1937, we have evidence of expenditures for flood protection along the river and the lower reaches of Dry Creek by subdivisions of government as follows:

1. Russian River, in Sonoma County, July 1, 1938, to June 26, 1945: County funds.__

[blocks in formation]

$58, 237.36

18, 850. 89

3, 894. 84

13, 657.85

1, 267.30

95, 908. 24

[blocks in formation]

In addition to the foregoing expenditures, through subdivisions of government, private individuals as of June 1945 expended $27,975 in the area between Geyserville and Healdsburg. It can be reasonably estimated that unreported private expenditures along the balance of the stream are in excess of this figure.

Immediately prior to the passage of the Sonoma County Flood Control Act, of which Mr. McGoldrick has previously testified, residents of Geyserville concerned with the possibility of flood recurrence had prepared the necessary documents and maps for the purpose of organizing a local flood-control district, fearing that delay in the commencement of the Russian River project would jeopardize their farms. Further progress is temporarily in abeyance awaiting action by the Congress.

The condition of the river adjacent to and northerly of Geyserville can best be illustrated by the photograph herewith submitted, which indicates a condition immediately south of the city of Healdsburg and is comparable to the Geyserville section. The conditions shown are to be corrected by channel straightening and bank protection.

The protective features constructed by local subdivisions of government and by private parties are by their very nature effective only in ordinary high waters; the construction of the Coyote Dam will increase their effectiveness by reducing the flow at flood season.

It is respectfully submitted that since 1938 the counties of Sonoma and Mendocino, together with groups and organizations, have been working toward the solution contained in the engineers' report on the Russian River.

Your favorable action is solicited.

Estimate by State engineer of amount of damage in Sonoma County due to flood of December 1937

[blocks in formation]

Telephone and telegraph systems: no damages reported____
Gas and electric systems:

Pacific Gas & Electric Co.: power- and telephone-lines

substations

Irrigation and domestic water supplies:

City of Healdsburg__

Farm canals and ditches filled up-

Urban improvements, homes, and businesses:
City of Healdsburg and vicinity:

Houses

Household effects---

Industries in rural areas: theater____

$117

2,031

1,500

$3, 648 5, 000

22, 100
23, 750

45, 850

200 3, 600

1, 200

5,000 0

4, 400

300

3,600

3, 900

49, 500
45,000

35,000

Estimate by State engineer of amount of damage in Sonoma County due to flood of December 1937-Continued

Summer camps, homes, and resort equipment:

Cottages and tent platforms__.
Cottages and furnishings_

Cottages and grounds

Dance halls..

Boats

Boathouses

Landing stages, platforms, and rafts..
Summer-dam material__

Farm buildings, fences, and equipment:
Ranch houses and household effects__
Outhouses (barns), hop kilns, and yards-
Tools, machinery and equipment...
Fences (53,000 rods)---

Livestock:

$57, 000
68,000

14, 000

48, 400
23,400

[blocks in formation]

Sheep (85)

Cows (16).

Poultry (700).

Miscellaneous_

Growing crops and produce in storage:

Vineyards (50 acres).

Prunes (100 acres)

Field crops (200 acres)

Hay (1,200 tons).

Dry feed (10 tons).

Hops (160 tons).

Feed in silos---

Dried prunes_

347, 200

425

1, 800

700

1,000

3,925

10,000

12,500

3,000

30,000

400

6, 400

8,700

20, 000

91,000

[blocks in formation]

Estimate by State engineer of amount of damage in Mendocino County due to

[blocks in formation]

Estimate by State engineer of amount of damage in Mendocino County due to flood of December 1937-Continued

[blocks in formation]

Gas and electric systems: Pacific Gas & Electric Co., reservoirs___

750

Irrigation and domestic water supplies: City of Ukiah__

300

Summer camps, homes, and resort equipment:

65 cabins, 16 small houses_.

Urban improvements, homes and businesses: City of Ukiah, parks_---
Industries in rural areas: No damages reported_.

National-forest campgrounds_-

Cold Creek fish hatchery.

300

0

$400

100, 000

30, 000

[blocks in formation]

Flood-protection works: River-bank repairs.

Increased operating expenses and interruption of business:

50,000

Pacific Gas & Electric Co---.

Northwestern Pacific Ry-.

$100

10,000

10, 100

Total damage in Mendocino County--.

Expenditures on Russian River for flood-control works, levees, channel-clearing, etc., from July 1, 1938, to May 1945, inclusive

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Expenditures on Russian River for flood-control works, levees, channel-clearing, etc., from July 1, 1938, to May 1945, inclusive-Continued

[blocks in formation]

Expenditures on Dry Creek for flood-control work, levees, channel clearing, etc., from July 1, 1938, to July 1, 1943, and supplementary to July 1, 1945

[blocks in formation]
« PreviousContinue »