Page images
PDF
EPUB

128 C. Cls.

On a report from the General Accounting Office showing the amount due in accordance with the opinion of the court, judgment for the plaintiff was entered for $3,576.44.

[blocks in formation]

Retired pay. Following the decisions in Alger v. United States, 126 C. Cls. 561, and Hottel v. United States, 128 C. Cls. 284, and on motion by the plaintiff in each case, which was agreed to by the defendant, it was ordered that each plaintiff was entitled to recover. Judgments suspended awaiting report as to the amounts due.

Government Contracts

On stipulations by the respective parties agreeing to settlement and consenting to judgment in each case, it was ordered that judgments be entered for the respective plaintiffs, as follows:

[blocks in formation]

No. 49530.

No. 49578.

Chas. Kurz & Co., Inc__--

Stockard Steamship Corporation_‒‒‒‒‒
Sabine Transportation Company, Inc----
No. 50148. The Minnesota Electronics Corporation______
No. 87-53. Time Oil Company and World-Wide Tankers,

Inc

47, 179. 80 58,860.83 4,395. 72

52,778.00

127, 935. 61

ON JULY 1, 1954

No. 48670. M. De Matteo Construction Company_
No. 49109. Polarus Steamship Co., Inc‒‒‒‒‒
No. 49219. Federal Motorship Corporation----
No. 49277. Van Brode Milling Company, Inc‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒
No. 49616. Epiphany Tankers Corporation_____.

20, 262. 43

56, 879. 65

56, 345. 53

48, 438. 10

70, 044. 55

No. 469-53. Hillcrea Export and Import Corporation___
No. 527-53. Northrop Aircraft, Inc..

20, 000. 00

23, 981.96

767

Transportation Charges

On stipulations by the respective parties agreeing to settlement and consenting to judgment in each case, it was ordered that judgments be entered for the respective plaintiffs, as follows:

ON JUNE 8, 1954

No. 48825. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company_
No. 135-52. Central of Georgia Railway Company--
No. 297-52. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway

Company

Transportation of Jeeps

--

$30,000.00

40, 720. 54

14,022. 32

In accordance with the opinion of the Court in each case, and upon a report from the General Accounting Office showing the amount due thereunder, it was ordered that judgments for the respective plaintiffs be entered as follows:

On May 4, 1954

No. 49163. The New York Central Railroad Company, A

No. 49348. The New York Central Railroad Company, A

Corporation (124 C. Cls. 324)_.

Corporation (124 C. Cls. 324)--

Cls. 420).

No. 49798. Western Maryland Railway Company (122 C.

$417.66

437.19

1,544. 65

No. 49908. Reading Company (122 C. Cls. 207)‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒ 11, 170. 81 No. 332–52. New York Central Railroad Company, Incor

[blocks in formation]

No. 50226. Illinois Central Railroad Company (122 C. Cls.

421)___.

15, 025. 58

No. 50238. New Orleans and Northeastern Railroad Company (122 C. Cls. 420)

12, 830. 28

Suits for Foreign Living Allowances

Following the opinion of the Court in the case of Pastor C. Vallesteros v. United States (No. 50275), 125 C. Cls. 218, and on stipulation of the parties agreeing to compromise and settlement and consenting to judgment in each case, it was ordered that judgments be entered as follows:

128 C. Cla

ON MAY 4, 1954

50239 Rito I. Arciaga.

Manuel M. Bactat_

Daniel B. Begonia_-_.
Magno C. Cabreros---
Andres DeGuzman_.
Francisco A. Floreza_.
William L. Hiquiana_..

Eliser B. Lebin__

Tony Manginsay.
Liboro O. Meneses_
Julio D. Mensalvas__-

Marcelo A. Ordonez___

Joe A. Ouano___.
Eugenie H. Patacsil
Ramon C. Ramos____.
Ricardo H. Sabella__
Aquilino B. Santos_.
Escolastico E. Soria.
Jimmy St. Marie___.
Manuel R. Villaneuva_.

$9,347.29 5,485. 05

5, 617.60 11, 133. 42

9, 341. 44

13, 172. 60 7, 898.55 6, 142. 13 5,360.57 11, 817. 89

6, 614. 81 10, 233. 64 9, 481. 38 8,820. 73

6, 894. 25

5, 968. 83

8, 175.98

14,379. 75

Suits for Salary or Per Diem Pay

9, 169. 18 7,354. 60

Following the opinions of the Court in the cases of Simon v. United States, 113 C. Cls. 182, Stringer v. United States, 117 C. Cls. 30, and Abbate v. United States, 123 C. Cls. 769, and similar cases, and on stipulations of the parties showing the amounts due each of the plaintiffs for salary or per diem pay, and consenting to judgment in the several stipulated amounts, judgments were entered for the respective plaintiffs for the amounts stated in the several stipulations as follows:

[blocks in formation]

On the basis of the opinion and mandate of the Supreme Court in the case of Howard C. Myers (No. 43671) et al.,

767

320 U. S. 561, and following the order of the Court of Claims therein, 101 C. Cls. 859; and upon the opinion in O'Rourke v. United States, 109 C. Cls. 33; and upon stipulation of the parties in the case set forth below, it was ordered that judgment be entered:

ON MAY 4, 1954

Docket No.
46648

Number of

Plaintiffs

1

Retired Pay Navy Enlisted Men

Following the opinion of the Court in the case of Christopher C. Sanders v. The United States, 120 C. Cls. 501, and upon stipulations of the parties showing the amounts due each of the plaintiffs for additional pay for service in the United States Navy, judgments were entered for the respective plaintiffs for the amounts stated in the several stipulations as follows:

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[blocks in formation]

Eminent domain; just compensation for flooding of lands containing oil, gas and other mineral rights, which mineral rights, together with right of ingress and egress for the purpose of drilling, were reserved to the respective plaintiffs at the time the surface of the lands was taken by the defendant pursuant to condemnation action in connection with the construction of the Denison Dam and Reservoir, authorized by the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1215, 1219). Upon a stipulation by the parties in each case, following offers of settlement by the respective plaintiffs, and acceptance thereof by the Attorney General, it was ordered that judgment be entered in the respective stipulated amounts as follows:

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

Overtime Pay Employees of Alaska Road Commission

Following the decisions in Marr v. United States, 123 C. Cls. 474, and Andrews, et al. v. United States, 126 C. Cls. 571, in the several suits brought by the respective plaintiffs, employees of the Alaska Road Commission, judgments for plaintiffs were entered as follows:

« PreviousContinue »