Reorganization Plan No. 7 of 1950: Hearings Before the Committee on Expenditures in the Executive Departments, House of Representatives, Eighty-first Congress, Second Session, on H. Res. 545, Resolved, that the House of Representatives Does Not Favor the Reorganization Plan Numbered 7 of 1950 Transmitted to the Congress by the President on March 13, 1950U.S. Government Printing Office, 1950 - 107 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 17
Page
... be subject to the approval of the Commission . ( 3 ) Personnel employed regularly and full time in the immediate offices of Commissioners other than the Chairman shall not be affected by the provisions of this reorganization plan .
... be subject to the approval of the Commission . ( 3 ) Personnel employed regularly and full time in the immediate offices of Commissioners other than the Chairman shall not be affected by the provisions of this reorganization plan .
Page 2
... be subject to the approval of the Commission . ( 3 ) Personnel employed regularly and full time in the immediate offices of Commissioners other than the Chairman shall not be affected by the provisions of this reorganization plan .
... be subject to the approval of the Commission . ( 3 ) Personnel employed regularly and full time in the immediate offices of Commissioners other than the Chairman shall not be affected by the provisions of this reorganization plan .
Page 14
By the methods proposed in these plans , Congress is called upon to approve , through its default , ex parte proposals without real consideration and without hearing from the public and interested groups who may be vitally affected by ...
By the methods proposed in these plans , Congress is called upon to approve , through its default , ex parte proposals without real consideration and without hearing from the public and interested groups who may be vitally affected by ...
Page 42
The first is in conformity with the recommendations of the Hoover Commission but the second is something that the Hoover Commission deliberately refused to approve after it had been proposed by the task force . Mr. HOLIFIELD .
The first is in conformity with the recommendations of the Hoover Commission but the second is something that the Hoover Commission deliberately refused to approve after it had been proposed by the task force . Mr. HOLIFIELD .
Page 43
While the chair- man may appoint the heads of major administrative units , their selec- tion is subject to the approval of the Commission . LIMITATIONS ARE OF DOUBTFUL EFFICACY While all of these limitations are desirable , it is ...
While the chair- man may appoint the heads of major administrative units , their selec- tion is subject to the approval of the Commission . LIMITATIONS ARE OF DOUBTFUL EFFICACY While all of these limitations are desirable , it is ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administrative adoption agencies appointed approval assigned Association authority BEALL believe Board branch Bureau carry Chairman Commissioners committee concerned Congress CONN consideration course Court CURRY deal decisions delegate designated determine direction Director divisions duties effect efficiency examiners executive executive department exercise experts fact follow functions GIBSON give Government head hearing HOFFMAN HOLIFIELD Hoover Commission House important independent individual influence Interstate Commerce Commission KARSTEN labor legislative letter Locomotive Inspection LYON major matters mean mission operation organization particular perform personnel political position practice present President problem procedure proposed provisions question railroads reasons recommendations regulations regulatory commissions relating Reorganization Plan represent respect responsibility safety Secretary Senate serve specifically staff statement statute STAUFFACHER supervision task force thing tion transferred transportation true understand United whole
Popular passages
Page 99 - Roosevelt addressed a letter to the commissioner asking for his resignation, on the ground "that the aims and purposes of the Administration with respect to the work of the Commission can be carried out most effectively with personnel of my own selection," but disclaiming any reflection upon the commissioner personally or upon his services.
Page 56 - It is hereby declared to be the national transportation policy of the Congress to provide for fair and impartial regulation of all modes of transportation, subject to the provisions of this Act, so administered as to recognize and preserve the inherent advantages of each...
Page 49 - The authority of Congress, in creating quasi-legislative or quasi-judicial agencies, to require them to act in discharge of their duties independently of executive control, cannot well be doubted; and that authority includes, as an appropriate incident, power to fix the period during which they shall continue, and to forbid their removal except for cause in the meantime.
Page 82 - Legal obligations that exist but cannot be enforced are ghosts that are seen in the law but that are elusive to the grasp.
Page 49 - The Commission is to be nonpartisan; and it must, from the very nature of its duties, act with entire impartiality. It is charged with the enforcement of no policy except the policy of the law.
Bibliographic information
| Title | Reorganization Plan No. 7 of 1950: Hearings Before the Committee on Expenditures in the Executive Departments, House of Representatives, Eighty-first Congress, Second Session, on H. Res. 545, Resolved, that the House of Representatives Does Not Favor the Reorganization Plan Numbered 7 of 1950 ... |
| Author | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Government Operations |
| Publisher | U.S. Government Printing Office, 1950 |
| Length | 107 pages |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |