Reorganization Plan No. 27 of 1950: Hearings ... on S. Res. 302 ... July 6 and 7, 1950 ...U.S. Government Printing Office, 1950 - 158 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 31
Page
I recognize , as I did last year , that the Commission made a further recommendation with respect to the organization of the health functions of the Government . The adoption of this plan will not in any way interfere with further ...
I recognize , as I did last year , that the Commission made a further recommendation with respect to the organization of the health functions of the Government . The adoption of this plan will not in any way interfere with further ...
Page
No person designated under this section shall by reason of such designation forfeit his rights with respect to his office held immediately prior to the taking effect of the pro- Visions of this reorganization plan . [ S. Res .
No person designated under this section shall by reason of such designation forfeit his rights with respect to his office held immediately prior to the taking effect of the pro- Visions of this reorganization plan . [ S. Res .
Page 4
No person designated under this section shall by reason of such designation forfeit his rights with respect to his office held immediately prior to the taking effect of the pro- visions of this reorganization plan . [ S. Res .
No person designated under this section shall by reason of such designation forfeit his rights with respect to his office held immediately prior to the taking effect of the pro- visions of this reorganization plan . [ S. Res .
Page 10
It seems to me that that goes too far , with due respect to the committee . For instance , the reorganization of the Armed Forces and the Department of Defense went to the Armed Services Committee , and it seems to me that they are the ...
It seems to me that that goes too far , with due respect to the committee . For instance , the reorganization of the Armed Forces and the Department of Defense went to the Armed Services Committee , and it seems to me that they are the ...
Page 17
I want to say that I was very much impressed with the observations that the distinguished Senator from South Dakota made with respect to the Department of Education . If this is so , there is , then , absolute- ly no reason at all for ...
I want to say that I was very much impressed with the observations that the distinguished Senator from South Dakota made with respect to the Department of Education . If this is so , there is , then , absolute- ly no reason at all for ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action activities American appointed approval Association authority BAUER believe bill Board Bureau Cabinet CHAIRMAN Commissioner of Education committee concerned Congress consideration Council create Department of Health direction directly Director economy effect establish EWING executive department existing Expenditures fact favor Federal Government Federal Security Administrator Federal Security Agency feel fields follows functions funds further give going head hearings Hoover Commission important independent individual interest LAWTON legislation major matters ment objections Office of Education operation opposed opposition organization person plan 27 position possible powers present President problems professional programs proposed Public Health Service question reason recommendations record reference Reorganization Plan representatives resolution respect responsibility Secretary seems Senator Senator MUNDT separate Social Security Social Security Administration statement status Surgeon Thank thing tion transfer United veterans views welfare
Popular passages
Page 93 - Transfers of other agencies: Director of the Bureau of the Budget is authorized and directed to study activities of other departments and agencies in the Federal Government and report to Congress on whether any of them should be transferred to the new department in the interest of economy and simplicity of administration.
Page 145 - Under the President, the heads of departments must hold full responsibility for the conduct of their departments. There must be a clear line of authority reaching down through every step of the organization and no subordinate should have authority independent from that of his superior.
Page 76 - Thank you, Senator. I appreciate having had the opportunity to be heard. Senator IVES. Thank you, Mr. Schiff, it has been a pleasure to have you. We will recess at this time until 10 o'clock tomorrow morning. (Whereupon, at 3:55 pm the committee was recessed, to reconvene at 10 am, Friday, July 7, 1950.)
Page 138 - Source: The Budget of the United States Government for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30,1950, Washington, 1949, p. 1386; ibid, for fiscal 1951, p. 207. Without going into the details of the FSA budget, I wish to point out that before that agency was created
Page 145 - United States Senate, Washington, DC DEAR SENATOR MCCLELLAN: In view of the consideration of Reorganization Plan No. 27, I thought you might be interested in the following resolution adopted by the Association of State and Territorial Health Officers at its annual meeting in October 1949: Whereas the
Bibliographic information
| Title | Reorganization Plan No. 27 of 1950: Hearings ... on S. Res. 302 ... July 6 and 7, 1950 ... |
| Author | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Expenditures in the Executive Departments |
| Publisher | U.S. Government Printing Office, 1950 |
| Length | 158 pages |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |