Reorganization Plan No. 27 of 1950: Hearings ... on S. Res. 302 ... July 6 and 7, 1950 ...U.S. Government Printing Office, 1950 - 158 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 43
Page
To the extent that this plan would give departmental status to the agency administering the social - security and educational functions , it is in accord with the one recommendation of the Commission on Organization of the Executive ...
To the extent that this plan would give departmental status to the agency administering the social - security and educational functions , it is in accord with the one recommendation of the Commission on Organization of the Executive ...
Page
... the bill was amended to de that it does not give the new department any functions other than those orized by previous legislation affecting the Federal Security Agency or any of Components thereof . therefore , it should be clearly ...
... the bill was amended to de that it does not give the new department any functions other than those orized by previous legislation affecting the Federal Security Agency or any of Components thereof . therefore , it should be clearly ...
Page 2
I want to give the spon- sors of the resolution and the representatives of the executive depart- ments who actually are interested in this and are involved in this pro- posed plan , ample time to thoroughly state their position , either ...
I want to give the spon- sors of the resolution and the representatives of the executive depart- ments who actually are interested in this and are involved in this pro- posed plan , ample time to thoroughly state their position , either ...
Page 3
... the Hoover Commission recommendations , testified that Reorgani- zation Plan No. 24- I think that that should be plan No. 27— was so much at variance with the Hoover Commission program that his committee could not give it support .
... the Hoover Commission recommendations , testified that Reorgani- zation Plan No. 24- I think that that should be plan No. 27— was so much at variance with the Hoover Commission program that his committee could not give it support .
Page 6
... the bill was amended to provide that it does not give the new department any functions other than those authorized by previous legislation affecting the Federal Security Agency or any of the components thereof .
... the bill was amended to provide that it does not give the new department any functions other than those authorized by previous legislation affecting the Federal Security Agency or any of the components thereof .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action activities American appointed approval Association authority BAUER believe bill Board Bureau Cabinet CHAIRMAN Commissioner of Education committee concerned Congress consideration Council create Department of Health direction directly Director economy effect establish EWING executive department existing Expenditures fact favor Federal Government Federal Security Administrator Federal Security Agency feel fields follows functions funds further give going head hearings Hoover Commission important independent individual interest LAWTON legislation major matters ment objections Office of Education operation opposed opposition organization person plan 27 position possible powers present President problems professional programs proposed Public Health Service question reason recommendations record reference Reorganization Plan representatives resolution respect responsibility Secretary seems Senator Senator MUNDT separate Social Security Social Security Administration statement status Surgeon Thank thing tion transfer United veterans views welfare
Popular passages
Page 93 - Transfers of other agencies: Director of the Bureau of the Budget is authorized and directed to study activities of other departments and agencies in the Federal Government and report to Congress on whether any of them should be transferred to the new department in the interest of economy and simplicity of administration.
Page 145 - Under the President, the heads of departments must hold full responsibility for the conduct of their departments. There must be a clear line of authority reaching down through every step of the organization and no subordinate should have authority independent from that of his superior.
Page 76 - Thank you, Senator. I appreciate having had the opportunity to be heard. Senator IVES. Thank you, Mr. Schiff, it has been a pleasure to have you. We will recess at this time until 10 o'clock tomorrow morning. (Whereupon, at 3:55 pm the committee was recessed, to reconvene at 10 am, Friday, July 7, 1950.)
Page 138 - Source: The Budget of the United States Government for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30,1950, Washington, 1949, p. 1386; ibid, for fiscal 1951, p. 207. Without going into the details of the FSA budget, I wish to point out that before that agency was created
Page 145 - United States Senate, Washington, DC DEAR SENATOR MCCLELLAN: In view of the consideration of Reorganization Plan No. 27, I thought you might be interested in the following resolution adopted by the Association of State and Territorial Health Officers at its annual meeting in October 1949: Whereas the
Bibliographic information
| Title | Reorganization Plan No. 27 of 1950: Hearings ... on S. Res. 302 ... July 6 and 7, 1950 ... |
| Author | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Expenditures in the Executive Departments |
| Publisher | U.S. Government Printing Office, 1950 |
| Length | 158 pages |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |