Reorganization Plan No. 27 of 1950: Hearings ... on S. Res. 302 ... July 6 and 7, 1950 ...U.S. Government Printing Office, 1950 - 158 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 35
Page
It is unnecessary to recite again the considerations which make the creation of such a department desirable . As I pointed out in my message transmitting Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1949 , such action has repeatedly been recommended by ...
It is unnecessary to recite again the considerations which make the creation of such a department desirable . As I pointed out in my message transmitting Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1949 , such action has repeatedly been recommended by ...
Page 10
It seems to me in any reorganization set - up , that these proposals , whatever form they may take , should all be centered in one committee for consideration , preferably this committee because this committee seems to be handling most ...
It seems to me in any reorganization set - up , that these proposals , whatever form they may take , should all be centered in one committee for consideration , preferably this committee because this committee seems to be handling most ...
Page 11
The Secretary was a kind of a co- ordinator who represented those three functions in the President's Cabinet and saw that they got proper consideration . Last year the bill went so far as to give all of the functions of the different ...
The Secretary was a kind of a co- ordinator who represented those three functions in the President's Cabinet and saw that they got proper consideration . Last year the bill went so far as to give all of the functions of the different ...
Page 17
27 would be particularly ill - timed in light of the fact that committees in both Houses are giving active consideration to a bill establishing a United Medical Administration as recommended by the Hoover Commission .
27 would be particularly ill - timed in light of the fact that committees in both Houses are giving active consideration to a bill establishing a United Medical Administration as recommended by the Hoover Commission .
Page 22
Let me ask you this further question : The argu- ment is made , and I think that you make that argument in your state- ment , that this plan if carried out and if it goes into effect will not pre- clude the further consideration of ...
Let me ask you this further question : The argu- ment is made , and I think that you make that argument in your state- ment , that this plan if carried out and if it goes into effect will not pre- clude the further consideration of ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action activities American appointed approval Association authority BAUER believe bill Board Bureau Cabinet CHAIRMAN Commissioner of Education committee concerned Congress consideration Council create Department of Health direction directly Director economy effect establish EWING executive department existing Expenditures fact favor Federal Government Federal Security Administrator Federal Security Agency feel fields follows functions funds further give going head hearings Hoover Commission important independent individual interest LAWTON legislation major matters ment objections Office of Education operation opposed opposition organization person plan 27 position possible powers present President problems professional programs proposed Public Health Service question reason recommendations record reference Reorganization Plan representatives resolution respect responsibility Secretary seems Senator Senator MUNDT separate Social Security Social Security Administration statement status Surgeon Thank thing tion transfer United veterans views welfare
Popular passages
Page 93 - Transfers of other agencies: Director of the Bureau of the Budget is authorized and directed to study activities of other departments and agencies in the Federal Government and report to Congress on whether any of them should be transferred to the new department in the interest of economy and simplicity of administration.
Page 145 - Under the President, the heads of departments must hold full responsibility for the conduct of their departments. There must be a clear line of authority reaching down through every step of the organization and no subordinate should have authority independent from that of his superior.
Page 76 - Thank you, Senator. I appreciate having had the opportunity to be heard. Senator IVES. Thank you, Mr. Schiff, it has been a pleasure to have you. We will recess at this time until 10 o'clock tomorrow morning. (Whereupon, at 3:55 pm the committee was recessed, to reconvene at 10 am, Friday, July 7, 1950.)
Page 138 - Source: The Budget of the United States Government for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30,1950, Washington, 1949, p. 1386; ibid, for fiscal 1951, p. 207. Without going into the details of the FSA budget, I wish to point out that before that agency was created
Page 145 - United States Senate, Washington, DC DEAR SENATOR MCCLELLAN: In view of the consideration of Reorganization Plan No. 27, I thought you might be interested in the following resolution adopted by the Association of State and Territorial Health Officers at its annual meeting in October 1949: Whereas the
Bibliographic information
| Title | Reorganization Plan No. 27 of 1950: Hearings ... on S. Res. 302 ... July 6 and 7, 1950 ... |
| Author | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Expenditures in the Executive Departments |
| Publisher | U.S. Government Printing Office, 1950 |
| Length | 158 pages |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |