Reorganization Plan No. 27 of 1950: Hearings ... on S. Res. 302 ... July 6 and 7, 1950 ...U.S. Government Printing Office, 1950 - 158 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 53
Page
While I do not believe that the criticisms advanced against plan No. 1 of 1949 were well founded , the present plan has been substantially modified to meet them . I recognize that as a result the present plan falls short of what I would ...
While I do not believe that the criticisms advanced against plan No. 1 of 1949 were well founded , the present plan has been substantially modified to meet them . I recognize that as a result the present plan falls short of what I would ...
Page 13
There is a very strong reason , I believe , for maintaining the inde- pendence of the health activities of the Federal Government . I do not consider that this plan does it . While it is a slight improvement over the plan last year ...
There is a very strong reason , I believe , for maintaining the inde- pendence of the health activities of the Federal Government . I do not consider that this plan does it . While it is a slight improvement over the plan last year ...
Page 18
I do not believe that is a sound argument . I see no reason why we should grant the Administrator any additional powers unless a definite money saving can be shown to result . No such showing has been made in this case .
I do not believe that is a sound argument . I see no reason why we should grant the Administrator any additional powers unless a definite money saving can be shown to result . No such showing has been made in this case .
Page 21
I do not believe that that statement is quite accurate , because another basic and funda- mental reorganization issue is whether the Health Department and whether the Public Health Service shall be grouped in a universal public - health ...
I do not believe that that statement is quite accurate , because another basic and funda- mental reorganization issue is whether the Health Department and whether the Public Health Service shall be grouped in a universal public - health ...
Page 29
Programs of Government are the things that cost money . Senator MUNDT . Of course , this plan is not part of the Hoover recommendation . We have been led to believe that if we adopt all of the Hoover Commission ...
Programs of Government are the things that cost money . Senator MUNDT . Of course , this plan is not part of the Hoover recommendation . We have been led to believe that if we adopt all of the Hoover Commission ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action activities American appointed approval Association authority BAUER believe bill Board Bureau Cabinet CHAIRMAN Commissioner of Education committee concerned Congress consideration Council create Department of Health direction directly Director economy effect establish EWING executive department existing Expenditures fact favor Federal Government Federal Security Administrator Federal Security Agency feel fields follows functions funds further give going head hearings Hoover Commission important independent individual interest LAWTON legislation major matters ment objections Office of Education operation opposed opposition organization person plan 27 position possible powers present President problems professional programs proposed Public Health Service question reason recommendations record reference Reorganization Plan representatives resolution respect responsibility Secretary seems Senator Senator MUNDT separate Social Security Social Security Administration statement status Surgeon Thank thing tion transfer United veterans views welfare
Popular passages
Page 93 - Transfers of other agencies: Director of the Bureau of the Budget is authorized and directed to study activities of other departments and agencies in the Federal Government and report to Congress on whether any of them should be transferred to the new department in the interest of economy and simplicity of administration.
Page 145 - Under the President, the heads of departments must hold full responsibility for the conduct of their departments. There must be a clear line of authority reaching down through every step of the organization and no subordinate should have authority independent from that of his superior.
Page 76 - Thank you, Senator. I appreciate having had the opportunity to be heard. Senator IVES. Thank you, Mr. Schiff, it has been a pleasure to have you. We will recess at this time until 10 o'clock tomorrow morning. (Whereupon, at 3:55 pm the committee was recessed, to reconvene at 10 am, Friday, July 7, 1950.)
Page 138 - Source: The Budget of the United States Government for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30,1950, Washington, 1949, p. 1386; ibid, for fiscal 1951, p. 207. Without going into the details of the FSA budget, I wish to point out that before that agency was created
Page 145 - United States Senate, Washington, DC DEAR SENATOR MCCLELLAN: In view of the consideration of Reorganization Plan No. 27, I thought you might be interested in the following resolution adopted by the Association of State and Territorial Health Officers at its annual meeting in October 1949: Whereas the
Bibliographic information
| Title | Reorganization Plan No. 27 of 1950: Hearings ... on S. Res. 302 ... July 6 and 7, 1950 ... |
| Author | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Expenditures in the Executive Departments |
| Publisher | U.S. Government Printing Office, 1950 |
| Length | 158 pages |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |